RR73 completes the QSO. Both QSO partners have sent calls, exchanges and QSLs. Am additional 73 message is a waste of time.73,Ed W0YK -------- Original message --------From: sdegroff via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Date: 10/21/23 13:18 (GMT-08:00) To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: sdegroff <sdegr...@reagan.com> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73? I don't know what F/H is, but i have seen wsjtx hang and not complete the qso after RR73.Stan DeGroff W8SRDSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone-------- Original message --------From: Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Date: 10/21/23 3:49 PM (GMT-05:00) To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Andy Durbin <a.dur...@msn.com> Subject: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win 8.1. I have observed several times that I could not complete a QSO by sending 73 after I had received an RR73. This is expected operation with F/H active but not when F/H is not active. I suspect that something is latched in software if F/H mode has been used but is then exited and WSJT-X is not re-started. Has anyone else seen this or have an explanation? 73, Andy, k3wyc
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
