What is F/H mode ?Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: sdegroff via wsjt-devel
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Date: 10/21/23 11:22 PM (GMT-05:00) To:
WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: sdegroff
<sdegr...@reagan.com> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
Huh?Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone-------- Original message
--------From: Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Date: 10/21/23 7:06 PM (GMT-05:00) To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc:
Andy Durbin <a.dur...@msn.com> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after
RR73?
After a review of ALL.TXT I no longer think this was related to prior use of
F/H mode. I had set TX5 to a "CQ DX message" and that was auto sequenced after
RR73 was received.
I'll need to be careful to ensure TX5 is set correctly when in QSO.
73,
Andy, k3wyc
From: Andy Durbin
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2023 12:14 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: No 73 allowed after RR73?
<!--
p
{margin-top:0;
margin-bottom:0}
-->
WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win 8.1.
I have observed several times that I could not complete a QSO by sending 73
after I had received an RR73. This is expected operation with F/H active but
not when F/H is not active. I suspect that something is latched in software if
F/H mode has been used
but is then exited and WSJT-X is not re-started.
Has anyone else seen this or have an explanation?
73,
Andy, k3wyc
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
