One thing about reliability:

I've not had xournal crash on me a lot. I think there may be once.
However, the lack of a recovery feature is concerning. If there is
recovery, crashes are less problematic.

Cheers,
Shuhao

On 11/18/2013 09:52 AM, Wilson Brenna wrote:
> I'll add that I didn't mention reliability and that I completely agree -
> I've never had a crash with Denis' Xournal, it's extremely stable. The
> current state of Xournalpp is that crashes are less and less common but
> still occur. When I started looking at the code, there were a few bugs in
> copy/paste and undo that caused frequent crashing, but that has since been
> fixed. I still get crashes from time to time, which I've noted in the
> Issues section on the Github page. So, I second the statement about xournal
> having a warranty of reliability.
> 
> I also think Shuhao makes a good point about user confusion. Certainly when
> I selected a project to use and to work on, I had a tough time seeing the
> best path. So this is probably a good time to talk about where to go from
> now! I think that with the original idea of Xournalpp being the future of
> Xournal, the name was appropriate, but now that it's not entirely clear
> what is happening, it's unfortunate but that's kind of the way it is. After
> this discussion I'll definitely add some historical notes on the Github
> page for Xournalpp so that the state of the projects is more clear.
> 
> Since I mostly see new developments appearing on Github, my personal
> recommendation would be to move Xournal development to Github and to use
> Daniel's recommendations for official project branches (stable,
> experimental, feature patches). That would at least consolidate development
> on that project. As far as Xournalpp I think the projects should remain
> separate but I'm open to suggestions. As for what I'll do, my plan was to
> modify Xournalpp to have the features I wanted, and that's been mostly
> accomplished now, so my in the next few months I plan to push out some
> *.deb binaries and focus on polishing things up to the point where it's
> easy for anyone to try it out.
> 
> One thing I'd really like to hear is Daniel's opinion on GTK3 and Windows
> porting of Xournalpp. I'd certainly trust your expertise and if you say it
> can be done, it's something I'd like to look at as well.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Shuhao Wu <shu...@shuhaowu.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So yeah that's what I figured as well. It seems like everyone has their
>>> own fork.
>>>
>>> While that seems to be beauty of opensource, this is just confusing and
>>> bad for the end users.
>>>
>>> There are a lot of improvements that could be made to xournal, a lot of
>>> which are already implemented. We should really get the authors to just
>>> merge everything into a mainline repository. This will allow all users
>>> to benefit. Developers who are interested will also have less of a hard
>>> time trying to figure out what to contribute to.
>>>
>>> I would love to contribute some stuff into xournal[1], but with this
>>> state I'm not sure which one is an non-outdated version, especially
>>> since I see a lot of great features (esp the capstone student projects)
>>> in forks.
>>>
>>> [1]: such as drawing horizontally and vertically aligned lines, drawing
>>> rectangles and other shapes without recognition, and having lines draw
>>> with the width determined by the pen pressure.
>>>
>>> As for xournal++... if it is a total rewrite I don't think it is
>>> appropriate to use almost the same name. That just seems confusing (as
>>> it did for me).
>>>
>>> Just my two cent.
>>>
>>> Shuhao
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps
> OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access
> Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server.
> Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xournal-devel mailing list
> Xournal-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xournal-devel
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Xournal-devel mailing list
Xournal-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xournal-devel

Reply via email to