On Wednesday, June 16, 2004 at 09:50:51, Stefan Reichör wrote: > Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Stefan Reichör <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >>>> I propose the following: > >>>> Add te prefix key W (mnemonic for working copy) > > > > [...] > > > >>> Using a prefix for working copy is good idea. > > > > Yes, but we usually use "local tree" to mean "working copy", so I > > would have chosen ?T for the prefix key. > > "working copy" is kind of hardwired in my brain, because it is named > that way in other revision control systems like cvs or svn. > > I can live with ?T also, but I would prefer ?W as prefix key. > > > Probably a good general convention would be > > > > * Capital letters => prefix for other commands > > > > * Lower-case letters => commands. > > > > That's mainly how Gnus works. > > That is a good strategy.
Hmm, why is it good? ;c) I have to type another key, i.e. Shift Down / Up ... hey these are two additional xevents ... IMHO we are following too many different churches, splitting to our own sometimes. It becomes a mess of bindings not being consistent, sometimes following the pcl-cvs church, then dired, Gnus, Masatake ... (sometimes) failing to be a good mnemonic for me. But, hey we can customize bindings ... ,c) Bye Robert
