> > > Hmm, why is it good? ;c) > > > > > > I have to type another key, i.e. Shift Down / Up ... > > > hey these are two additional xevents ... > > > > > Once you memorize a key bind, you can operate quickly. > > However, sometimes it is difficult to memorize the key bind. > > Sometimes key grouping helps you memorize the binding(I hope). > > > > > IMHO we are following too many different churches, splitting > > > to our own sometimes. It becomes a mess of bindings not being > > > consistent, sometimes following the pcl-cvs church, then > > > dired, Gnus, Masatake ... (sometimes) failing to be a good > > > mnemonic for me. > > > > Wow. My articles are religious? > > I have not known enough words/terms to explain my idea. > > I think we all understand your ideas ... most of us are no > native English speakers ... > > > pcl-cvs should be the biggest church. other should be rather > > smaller. > > Hey here we are again. How big? How small? Who judges? I > want a dictator like RMS or Milan, saying this is the one > and right way, and all should follow these rules.
Generally, we have to believe common sense. Will you ask about "common sense"? Of course it is difficult to explain. But I can show examples. During development I assume the number of xtla users who have three keyboards is less than the number of xtla users who have one keyboard. During development I assume the number of xtla users who have 100 keyboards is less than the number of xtla users who have 3 keyboard. Do you have objection about above examples? However, about your question, the answer is simple. if the keybinding used in xtla derived from pcl-cvs confects with that from dired, use pcl-cvs one. Of course, if we feel a pcl-cvs's binding is wrong, we should apply another rules. Will you ask what is "we feel"? As you know, this is (while t) question. If you find wrong binding for generic users, tell it here. If you find wrong binding for only you, edit .emacs. About the final judges, Stefan should take.
