On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 13:40 -0800, Arron Ferguson wrote: [a rather vicious rant]
And I thought Ian was harsh. Whilst I have reservations about his perspective, his behaviour is justified by his perspective. He simply objects, based on his interpretation of matters, to Gerald applying the term XUL to technologies other than Mozilla XUL if they are not a pound for pound copy of the Mozilla XUL API. Unless we can change his mind, that is not an unreasonable stance to take. Let's keep it civil, please? The only thing that flames do is cause more flames and destroy what little constructive comment had originally taken place. Must we go back to square one... again? -- - Charlie Charles Goodwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Online @ http://vexi.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ xul-talk mailing list xul-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
