@SAM ZONDI we can either debate both chief; I'm just using the terminology
that I'M familiar with, please bare with me!!!

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Samson Zondi <[email protected]> wrote:

> @Ngcobo.  Hawu kanti the thesis is the "nationalization of the mines"?  Why
> is this the thesis? Why cant it be the socialization of the mines? Any idea?
> my leader.
>
> >>> Sandile Ngcobo <[email protected]> 11/23/2009 9:12 AM >>>
>
> I've always admired Cde JC, His revolutionary understanding is amusing.
> I've always expected him to to give guidance, clarity, while instilling
> revolutionary discipline more especially amongst young cadres of our
> movement like Cde JM.
>  When he decided to attack Malema in public; what was he (AND US)
> expecting in return??? Malema did not surprise me; I suspected that he was
> going to respond in the manner he did.
>  Cde DGS of the party should learn to engage in the correct platforms not
> in front of cameras.
>  let us not loose the thesis here; which is nationalisation of mines!
>
>   On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:46 AM, sabelo gina <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>   Comrades,
>>  I think there is the "moment" that we risk missing here. The ANCYL has
>> gotten the ANC NEC to agree to receive a paper on nationalisation in their
>> next meeting. I think the role of communists is therefore to take advantage
>> of that "moment" and write a paper that must help all of us without
>> attacking anyone in the process.
>>  I am happy that Comrade Kaizer agrees with me that Cde JC is not at all
>> innocent in this thing whilst we do not condone the tone of the response
>> from the ANCYL, but we expected more from JC in the light of the moment.
>>  I am saying this mindful of the fact that some have said the Act was as
>> far as we could go as a country( beneath the soil argument). What is the
>> view of Cde JC on that, bling or no bling on the part of ANCYL, this
>> interpretation needs to be answered by leading communists like JC.....
>> considering that it is the Chair of the Party who spoke about the Act.
>>  I do think that a seperate discussion with JM on his attitude towards
>> Communists in general is relevant. It is true that he seems to be aligned
>> with the "swaar gevaar" brigade!
>>  Let us not miss the 'moment'!
>>  Comradely,
>>  Cedric
>>
>>    On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Kaizer Mohau 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dear Comrades
>>>
>>> Comrades it is my view that this Malema and Cronin matter must be
>>> debated properly so that we do not end up making strategic mistakes
>>> which will cause the undermining of Polokwane strategic victory. In
>>> all honesty both Cde Julius and JC must take responsibilities for
>>> causing this crisis.
>>>
>>> Firstly, Comrade JC has a tendency of attacking other Comrades in the
>>> media as though that is the only platform on which to engage other
>>> cadres. Two or Three years ago, Comrade JC attacked those who
>>> supported Cde President Jacob Zuma and he called the criminals - This
>>> is oje example - today he speaks about a debate within our structures,
>>> again addressing journalists.
>>>
>>> Having said that, Cde Julius Malema, got very low by labeling Cde JC
>>> as white messiah - this language was authored by the 1996 class
>>> project, during its tactic of destroying the Alliance - this label was
>>> equally used when the reactionary North West Provincial leadership
>>> called for the eradication of dual membership.
>>>
>>> So it will never be correct and understandable if we fail to apply our
>>> heads and hearts very seriously on this matter.
>>>
>>> In as much as I agree with the Party view on this matter - I believe
>>> it was not neccessary for the Party to enter this debate however
>>> important it is for the Party to defend its leaders and cadres, the
>>> Party must ensure that it promotes comradely debates.
>>>
>>> Now, it is going to be my final conclusion in my coming attempted
>>> proper analysis on this issue - so as Cde Blade Nzimande, General
>>> Secretary of the SACP usually say "Asikhulume"
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:57 AM, sabelo gina <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > But comrades, to be honest Jeremy Cronin's input also attacked
>>> Malema....
>>> > leaders must find time to tell our leader that he started this whole
>>> thing.
>>> > Poor Malema!
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Gugu Ndima <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> YCLSA Disgusted by Malema's Racism and Insults
>>> >>
>>> >> 21 November 2009
>>> >>
>>> >> The Young Communist League of SA (uFasimba) is disgusted with the
>>> insults
>>> >> and racist labels from Julius Malema under the guise of criticism of
>>> the
>>> >> Deputy General of the SACP, Jeremy Cronin. The YCL believes that
>>> Malema has
>>> >> sunk to the lowest ebb of being racist and hurling insults, instead of
>>> >> engaging with profound debates that Cde. Cronin was raising.
>>> >>
>>> >> We view the labelling of Cde. Cronin as a "white messiah" not only as
>>> >> racist, but as an insult to the principle and ideology of the National
>>> >> Liberation Movement, that of non-racism. We are confident that the
>>> majority
>>> >> of members of the ANC Youth League do not share these racist and
>>> insulting
>>> >> labels. We also view the racist and insulting labels as a lost
>>> opportunity
>>> >> for Malema to engage with the all important debate on
>>> "nationalisation". We
>>> >> must emphasise that the "call for nationalisation" is not the preserve
>>> of
>>> >> Malema, and that invitation to debate should not be a trap to lure
>>> people
>>> >> into a racist, insulting and senseless room.
>>> >>
>>> >> Why invoke Nelson Mandela to justify Racist and Insulting Labels
>>> >>
>>> >> We note that Malema substitute a sensible debate for insults and
>>> racist
>>> >> labels, and bravery for disrespect; but we believe that we can
>>> disagree on
>>> >> any issue and still maintain respect as comrades. What is worse is
>>> that
>>> >> Malema invokes the names of respectable leaders of the ANC, including
>>> Nelson
>>> >> Mandela, to justify this nonsensical insults and racist remarks.
>>> >>
>>> >> The fact that Mandela was not a communist at the time and used to
>>> disrupt
>>> >> Communist Party meetings does not give Malema permission to act in
>>> such
>>> >> backward fashion. Mandela has recorded these auto-biographical facts
>>> so that
>>> >> we learn from it, and not repeat it like headless chickens with the
>>> hope
>>> >> that we (including Malema) will one day be like Mandela. If we do
>>> that, it
>>> >> means that we should follow every little act and statement that
>>> Mandela made
>>> >> like parrots, even when the conditions do not allow. We now know more
>>> about
>>> >> the need for the Alliance and the relationship between the SACP and
>>> the ANC
>>> >> than Mandela did, and we should follow his latter day example of
>>> >> respectfully engaging with Alliance leaders.
>>> >>
>>> >> Alliance Protocol
>>> >>
>>> >> We are also disappointed that the call from the ANC President and the
>>> >> Alliance Summit for a "cease of fire" in trading insults is being
>>> undermined
>>> >> by Malema.
>>> >>
>>> >> We will in the coming week ask for a meeting with the leadership of
>>> the
>>> >> ANC Youth League to discuss this and other matters.
>>> >>
>>> >> Issued by the YCLSA Head Office
>>> >>
>>> >> Contact
>>> >>
>>> >> Gugu Ndima
>>> >>
>>> >> National spokesperson
>>> >>
>>> >> O767831516
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Gugu Ndima
>>> >> +27 76 783 1516
>>> >> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>> Please find our Email Disclaimer here-->: *
>>> http://www.ukzn.ac.za/disclaimer*
>>>
>>> >>>
>>>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to