Cdes et al
 
Let me first applaud comrades for their enthusiasm in debating the
issue.
 
It is not correct to enter the debate by looking at who laid the
charge. The objectivity in this case was to look at the merit of the
charges. To me, whether SASCO did not reprimand Malema then is
immaterial. The verdict of the case tells a good story on women
emancipation and the dangers of patriarchy. The statement by SASCO is
very clear and does not need interpretation.
 
I do not agree with the assertion that those comrades who are at the
wrong side of law should be blindly supported solely because they lead
structures of our movement. If SASCO misread the situation then and
correct it now, what becomes wrong with it. SASCO is an independent
organisation that is guided by its constitution and its traditions.
Nothing in the constitution of SASCO speaks about it being a student
wing of any other structure. We should then respect that.
 
Those who are preoccupied with leaderdship and successions should not
force views and resolutions of structures to be aligned with a certain
faction within the ANC. The difference between independence and
autonomity is very huge and should be clarified once and for all.
Independence means that the structure can take whatever decision it
deems fit to take in achieving its vision. While, autonomy refers to the
powers to run an organisation in line with the mother organisation. A
clear example of autonomous structures is the ANCYL and YCLSA.
 
ANCYL can not take decisions that contradict decisions of the ANC,
YCLSA cannot take decisions that are contrary to those of the SACP. In
fact decisions of the ANC automatically binds the ANCYL and decisions of
SACP automatically binds the YCLSA. Thus, both these structures are not
independent from their mother-bodies but autonomous to run indepedently
in line with the vision and resolutions of their mother-bodies. They can
as well influence the decisions of their mother-bodies.
 
The above is not applicable to SASCO. It is not handled or bound by a
decision of any structure. It operates with the CC approach that guides
its interaction with all structures and institutions within society. It
has no influence to the decisions of this structures and institutions.
It independently invites progressive structures to its gatherings but
does not choose for the structures on who should be sent. In line with
the CC approach, it can differ with any statements made by the deployee
of the structure(s) it invited.
 
In 1997, SASCO rejected gear in its national conference. It rejected
the selfish accumulation system without fear. It is progressively in
support of everything that benefits the poor and the working class. It
advocates for free education, better students' services, access to
higher and further education etc. without looking at who is leading this
institutions. It cannot be silenced today because a progressive decision
by a court to fight patriarchy involves the invincible JM.
 
I applaud the leadership of SASCO for living what it always stands for.
The revolution cannot be handled with velvet gloves. It is a mammoth
responsibility of the progressive structures to keep it in shape lest we
take our country to a banana republic. Since its establishment to date,
SASCO has jeolously kept the political compas that guides its action and
that is working class biasness. 
 
I remain....
 
Mduduzi Herman Vilakazi
Internal Auditor
Dept of P/Works, Roads and Transport
Mpumalanga Province
 
Tel:  013 766 8280
Cell: 083 357 4849/ 083 990 8523
Fax: 086 544 3205

"Ignorant men don't know what good they hold in their hands until
they've flung it away."
-Sophocles
 


>>> Lungisa Mzizana <[email protected]> 3/16/2010 6:08 PM >>>
In the current political discourse everyone is mobilised to be an
"cheer leader" no more shall have any analysis that can be objective in
discussions, An analysis is either aligned with a certain faction or
with the "leadership debate" that se
em to pre-occupie everyone in our
movement. South African Student Congress is an Autonomous structure
within the Progressive Youth Alliance and it therefore reserve its right
to engage on any political debates with no consultation of anyone hence
the release of the press statement, the statement is inline with the
respect of the state institutions and understanding the judgement in its
entirety.
It is not an attack to the President of the Youth League but an
objective anlysis of the judgement by the Equality court and the
statement has got nothing to do with the leadership debate of 2012, if
one argues that SASCO is engage in such then that person should be
consistent with the analysis and go through the recent press release of
SASCO, from the statement on the Alliance after the Special Congress of
the SACP,on Minister Shabangu, to the statement on Minister Nyanda,
further to the statement on the President of Youth League and be
consistent in the analysis, but not to pick a particular statement an
grandstand with it in a quest of political relevance,
But the matter is everyone is eager that South African Students
Congress should be its ally in their plan of stuffling debates in the
interest of particular faction, which this pose a danger in the entire
movement and create an organisation that cant criticaly engage on any
issue but is surrounded with "yes leaders". 
SASCO remains an Autonomous student organisation which is neither a
student wing nor a baby of any organisation and therefore we shall
continue to occupy our space with no fear of any individual who would
seek political relevance with us....


On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Lone Maxwell <[email protected]>
wrote:


I read with utter disgust the celebratory statement by SASCO welcoming
the court verdict by the Equality court on Julius Malema. My initial
thought on the matter was to question how a supposedly progressive
student formation can ever celebrate a verdict on a complaint laid by
the liberal and racist Afriforum on one of its own. How does a PYA
component resort to joining the opposition in its attack against another
PYA leader within the MDM. Perhaps more puzzling is that the alleged
‘hate speech’ was said at a SASCO gathering, and SASCO as an
organization failed to correct or reprimand Julius at that very
gathering last year, let alone raise its dissatisfaction. Instead his
articulations where met with delight and cheers from the audience
including its leadership. This mischievousness with the truth or sudden
amnesia of the occurrence of events by SASCO is questionable, and can
only be deduced to reflect the highest form of grandstanding and
opportunism. The only conclusion one gathers from this is that the
leadership of SASCO is in a desperate attempt or quest to position
itself along the current 2012 debacles (inspite of the 16th National
Congress resolution against such), to the extent that it dishonestly
conjures up and clings to an event in history it had no problems with.
The tone and attacks on the ANCYL in the latest press releases sent
under the name of SASCO from the YCL Press Release account is perhaps a
guiding clue to the real misdemeanor behind the monkey business.

Comradely yours
Lone Maxwell
Northern Cape

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply
to this message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery
options, pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email
[email protected] . You don't have to put
anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the
message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address
(repeat): [email protected] .




-- 
Lungisa Mzizana
Provincial Chairperson WC SASCO 
Cell: 073 655 2734
Email: [email protected]

-- 
You are subscribed. This footPlease POST your comments to yclsa-eom
[email protected] or reply
to this message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery
options, pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email
[email protected] . You don't have to put
anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the
message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address
(repeat): [email protected] .

This message and any attachments relating to official business of the
Mpumalanga Provincial Government (MPG) is proprietary to the MPG and
intended for the original addressee only.
The message may contain information that is confidential and subject to
legal privilege. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender.

If you receive this message in error, please notify the original sender
immediately and destroy the original message. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you
must not disseminate, copy, use, distribute, or take any action in
connection therewith.

The MPG cannot insure that the integrity of this communication has been
maintained, nor that it is free of errors, viruses, interception and /
or interference. The MPG is not liable whatsoever for loss or damage
resulting from the opening of this message and / or attachments and / or
the use of the information contained in this message and / or
attachments.

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

<<IMAGE.gif>>

Reply via email to