After reading my own post, I believe what I meant to say is that:
"Zen is in all, but all is not Zen."
It is hard to express a "sense or awareness".
Anyhow, these are just words. Though nothing I've posted is important, you still manage to respond everytime.
I truly have learnt and enjoyed. *smile*
My respect to your dedication and commitment,
donald hwong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well stated, Bill. We shall continue alone these subjects some other day.
All is Zen, everything we posted, you, me as well as everyone else are all Zen.
These are all menifestation of Zen. Branches of the tree and not its life force.
To be more "wordly correct", Zen is all. How is that?
Thank you for your patience and support and this discussion stream. A deep bowl to you.
Bill Smart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Wednesday, June 21 donald hwong (JMJM) wrote:
[...introductory portion snipped...]
[JMJM...]Is there a disconnect in the teachings after 2500 years? Is there
one true which is also all? Or is it important?
Importance is a relative term.
For those who wish to paint-by-number these teachings, their continuity and
the concept of 'One Truth which is All' are very important.
For me these teachings, their continuity and the concept are usually very
interesting; sometimes helpful, sometimes misleading and distracting, but
For me zazen, or more correctly stated the EFFECTS of zazen, are important.
Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
Do you Yahoo!?
Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. __._,_.___
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!
|Zen buddhism||Zen||Zen alarm clock|
|Zen micro||Zen touch||Zen cart|
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Zen_Forum" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.