I guess you've gone out of town for a while, but I hope we can continue with this thread when you're back. I have the feeling it'll be good fun! (but I still know I'm correct...). Gone fishing, Mike.
Robert Kirbo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:23:09 -0800, mike brown wrote: > The critique was a well founded one regarding zen and the impossible > sentimentality of the seasons (this is just not Zen) No, the critique was a foolish one on a poetry form that you are not schooled in, and your constant harping on what you deem to be Zen or not Zen constitutes an insistance of dialectic that is itself rather alien to Zen. Stop instructing and begin actually being the nature of Zen. Your example by commentary is really moving further and further from Zen and further and further into your own ego. Prove me wrong and respond without an "argument" or critique. Cheers, Zenbob After today, will be out of town for a while...so this is my closing comment. I did make an attempt to close on a more harmonious note, as posted earlier. -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today! Yahoo! Groups Links --------------------------------- Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! for Good
