Mike, I’m glad you survived the journey to China. I hope you weren’t adversely affected by all the snow that parts of China has been reporting.
I’m not saying that what you do personally doesn’t have an effect on society; neither am I saying that what happens in society doesn’t have a personal affect on you. In fact, I’m saying the two are linked. My point, or rather the point I borrowed from Arthur Koestler, is that you can work change from each of those different prospective. You can work to change society (political - embodied by the commissar - change the system and you allow people the space to change themselves), or you can work to change yourself (spiritual - embodied by the yogi - change yourself and you > will inspire others to change eventually changing the system). Or I suppose > you can work from both ends at the same time – but that can lead to a wobble. I choose to change myself and believe that will propagate through society. Others can choose to change society believing that in doing so they will improve the lives of others. Neither way is wrong, and neither way is the only way. Glad you’re back…Bill! From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mike brown Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 2:47 PM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: SV: RE: [Zen] Re: D.L. Hi Bill, Well, glad to report that I survived the journey from China to Japan! Now, in response to your last email I would say that to change `from the inside` thru a spiritual practice won`t help you escape the fact that the decisions you make (or don`t make) will have an effect on society in a political way. For example, a person might take up vegetarianism due to their spiritual `insights` and feel compelled to promote their stance. On the other hand, they might do nothing in a public manner but will then be supporting the status quo (and hence the profits and animal deaths of the meat industry). Either way, by act or omission, their choices affect society politically. Mike. ----- Original Message ---- From: Bill Smart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, 11 February, 2008 4:19:18 PM Subject: SV: RE: [Zen] Re: D.L. Mike, Have a good trip...I'll be looking forward to your post...Bill! --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com, mike brown <uerusuboyo@ ...> wrote: > > Hi! Thanks for the response Bill. Needless to say there are lots of things I would like to comment on in your post but I'm literally (well, almost literally) running out the door to catch the ferry from Shanghai to Osaka (not quite bonny Scotland)!! As soon as I get an opportunity to respond I will give you a broadside! Later, Mike. > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Bill Smart <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ..> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com > Sent: Sunday, 10 February, 2008 7:23:58 PM > Subject: SV: RE: [Zen] Re: D.L. > > Mike, > > Saying 'everything we do or don't do is political' is true only for > those who see everything from a political perspective. It's the same > as saying 'everything we do or don't do is zen' - and that's said a lot > on this forum. That's true too, from a certain perspective. > > There's an important essay that touches on this written by Arthur > Koestler in the 1940's and entitled THE YOGI AND THE COMMISSAR. It > examines what he believes are the two approachs to engender change in > the world (save all sentient beings). He examines 'change from > without' (politcal - embodied by the commissar - change the system and > you allow people the space to change themselves) and 'change from > within' (spiritual - embodied by the yogi - change yourself and you > will inspire others to change eventually changing the system). > > I choose the approach of 'change from within' and the method of zen. > Others choose 'change from without' and the method of polictics. > > So...I'll take the high road 'n you take the low road...n' I'll get > t'Scotland 'afor yee! > > ...Bill! > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com, mike brown <uerusuboyo@ ...> wrote: > > > > I think your opinion is very well put, but in response to Bill's > assertion that what has the political situation in Tibet got to with > Zen I would say that everything we do as members of a society has > political ramifications. Even if we do nothing, claiming to be > apolitical, we still end up unwittingly supporting the status quo. > Further, what about the vows repeated daily in Zen temples everywhere > to save countless beings? Could it be argued that by doing nothing to > help people practice freedom of religion (in this case towards > Enlightenment) against state control we might pave the way for state > control of religion (or individual practice of that religion) in > countries where Zen itself is practiced? Again, everything we do (or > not do), is political. > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _ > Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it > now. > http://uk.answers. <http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/> yahoo.com/ > _____ Sent from Yahoo! <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mailuk/taglines/isp/control/*http:/us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51949/*http:/uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html> - a smarter inbox. __________ NOD32 2877 (20080215) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com