No no, Bill.  That's too late to be considered a Hippie.  Sorry LA. :-)

You must be living at Berkeley during the sixties, then you would meet the HareKrisna, long hair dudes, singing ladies, never shaving guitar players.... Then you will be moved to get up and revolt against all establishments -- school, draft, government, teachers and corporations.

Ah... those fun years, especially FREE LOVE and all the mariwana...

Be Enlightened In This Life - We ALL Can
http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com
http://www.heartchan.org


On 2/25/2011 2:13 AM, Bill! wrote:

JMJM.

I lived in Berkeley/Rockridge from 1984-1995...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>, Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明 <chan.jmjm@...> wrote:
>
> Hello Mayka,
>
> I completely agree. I said alone because you said, "... no one but Mel
> responded."
>
> I was in Berkeley 1967 - 1972. A true hippie. Well??
>
> Be Enlightened In This Life - We ALL Can
> http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com
> http://www.heartchan.org
>
>
> On 2/24/2011 12:32 PM, Maria Lopez wrote:
> >
> > /JMJM;/
> > //
> > /The written style of your response sounded as kind of hippie from the
> > sixties. /
> > //
> > /You have misunderstand my posting. I was only making a point and
> > that was that in forums samsara have a greater power than actually the
> > real dharma. That's all what I meant. . Posting addressed wasn't
> > about feeling alone or something like that. But about how easy we are
> > lead to samsara and how little is the strenght of the practice in the
> > forum. I have no expectations of anyone given a response to my mail
> > at all. What it meant was that is much easy to be dragged down by
> > intellectual and samsara stronger energy in the forum rather than from
> > the energy of the practice because there is no much of that in the
> > forum. That's all what I meant. It was just merely a reflexion badly
> > expressed obviously. /
> > //
> > /Thank you for good intentions ./
> > /Mayka/
> >
> > --- On *Thu, 24/2/11, Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明
> > /<chan.jmjm@...>/* wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明 <chan.jmjm@...>
> > Subject: Re: [Zen] Can A Buddha Harm Others?(to ED/Mayka/list)
> > To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Thursday, 24 February, 2011, 15:52
> >
> > Mayka Dear,
> >
> > Please don't feel that you are alone. Many of us on the forum are
> > with you.
> >
> > I am sure those on the forum who meditates "connect" with you. I
> > am also somewhat certain those who do not, probably do not. Steve
> > already posted something like, "... there are those wanted to show
> > that they are right..."
> >
> > As you know, that's what delusion is.
> >
> > Harvey already said, "zen teachers can not be nice, need to talk
> > like a blade." On the other hand, he also said, that we must drip
> > instead of poring water over dry land. That's when as suggested
> > by my teacher, "we need wisdom in our journey to accompany
> > compassion."
> >
> > It's time for me to support Mel's post a little in my next post.
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > Be Enlightened In This Life - We ALL Can
> > http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com <http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com/>
> > http://www.heartchan.org <http://www.heartchan.org/>
> >
> >
> > On 2/24/2011 7:30 AM, Maria Lopez wrote:
> >> /Mel:/
> >> //
> >> /Thank you for the kindness of your comments. Just a shame that
> >> I went a little bit too much emotional over the rape subject
> >> and went entangled on myself emotions and talking non sense. It
> >> only comes to show how easy is to loose oneself in samsara and
> >> that the difficulties of participating in forums. /
> >> //
> >> /The first initial post you mention is a post coming from the
> >> practice and yet and no one except from yourself have said a word
> >> about it. But as soon as I said things such as: "Take justice
> >> in one's hand and cut the sexual organs of a rapist", it's
> >> incredible the attention I got!. It only comes to show that the
> >> strenght of this forum is not in our practice./
> >> //
> >> /Thanks for your response and appreciation/
> >> /Mayka/
> >> --- On *Thu, 24/2/11, Mel /<gunnar19632000@...>
> >> <http://uk.mc862.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=gunnar19632000@...>/*
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Mel <gunnar19632000@...>
> >> <http://uk.mc862.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=gunnar19632000@...>
> >> Subject: [Zen] Can A Buddha Harm Others?(to ED/Mayka/list)
> >> To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>
> >> <http://uk.mc862.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com>
> >> Date: Thursday, 24 February, 2011, 13:12
> >>
> >> It is impossible to force change on anyone, ED. However,
> >> please do understand that I wouldn't have been the first, nor
> >> will I be the last to take note of openly dualistic postings
> >> from those outside of the path, and those who aspire to the
> >> Zen way of life itself are bound to notice such posts
> >> eventually. For better or worse, you may hear or read things
> >> you don't want to hear, or read about. That's just the way it
> >> is. That's the bad news, but the good news is that you're
> >> probably keeping the group alive by your very words of what
> >> must be quite extensive knowledge about many things...odd as
> >> they may be to some of us. Read Mayka's first reply to
> >> Steve's posting concerning this current thread. It's quite
> >> eye-opening. Nothing academic...just simple,
> >> clear-headeness..possible dualistic translation: BIG MIND
> >> Just as they have self-confessed atheists and other 'sinners'
> >> in biblical forums...we on the other hand have academics like
> >> yourself who wish to work out Zen without the experience.
> >> That's all well and good if that suits you. As I said ED,
> >> nobody can force change on you, and if that bothers them(you
> >> can include me on that list if I'm guilty), then they
> >> themselves are breaking faith with the old prince himself,
> >> and what he aspired to and taught
> >> Buddha be praised
> >> Mel
> >>
> >> --- On *Thu, 24/2/11, ED /<seacrofter001@...>
> >> <http://uk.mc862.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=seacrofter001@...>/*
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> From: ED <seacrofter001@...>
> >> <http://uk.mc862.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=seacrofter001@...>
> >> Subject: Re: [Zen] Can A Buddha Harm Others?
> >> To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>
> >> <http://uk.mc862.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com>
> >> Received: Thursday, 24 February, 2011, 1:31 AM
> >>
> >>
> >> Hello Mel,
> >> Are you possessed by an irresistible need to have me
> >> change my ways to make you happy? ;-)
> >> Best regards,
> >> --ED
> >> --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>
> >> <http://uk.mc862.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com>,
> >> Mel <gunnar19632000@>
> >> <http://uk.mc862.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=gunnar19632000@>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> MEL: Yes, but the words DELIBERATE and INTENTIONAL are
> >> open to interpretation
> >> (..ED, no need to post quotes from the dictionary or
> >> Wikipedia. I am interested only in experiences, not
> >> academic discussions..)
> >>
> >>
> >
>


Reply via email to