KG silence can be shared.
.establishing a silent relationship is the most beautiful of all...no words
need to be spoken
there is harmony and peace...merle
Either way, makes me out to be a thief. ;)
Silence cannot be shared, so we interrupt it with talking so as
not to appear rude.
KG
On 9/8/2012 1:13 AM, Bill! wrote:
>Kris,
>
>When you say it I prefer 'Suchness'.
>
>...Bill!
>
>--- In [email protected], Kristopher Grey <kris@...> wrote:
>>
>> "More" or less, misses the point again.
>>
>> There is nothing to do to realize this. There is only
this experiencing.
>> 'You' and your 'experience(s)' of objects/events are
but aspects of
>> this, arising and passing. Nothing could be simpler.
>>
>> Some realize this some don't. Doesn't change this.
How could it [rhet]?
>> I realize you may only see and/or express this
otherwise. Such is the
>> nature of appearances. Suchness ("Just this" if you
prefer).
>>
>> KG
>>
>>
>> On 9/8/2012 12:11 AM, Bill! wrote:
>> >
>> > Kris,
>> >
>> > More important than whether or not either of
these personages actually
>> > existed or how accurate the [translated]
3rd-person accounts of what
>> > they did and what they said is that YOU
EXPERIENCE what they are said
>> > to have experienced.
>> >
>> > And you can do that. I'm confident 10's of
thousands or many more than
>> > that have.
>> >
>> > ...Bill!
>> >
>> > --- In [email protected] <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>,
>> > Kristopher Grey <kris@> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On 9/7/2012 7:39 AM, mike brown wrote:
>> > > > There is a *big* difference between
these stories of Buddha and
>> > > > Christ. With Buddha's story it makes
no difference whether you
>> > believe
>> > > > Buddha was a real man or not...
>> > >
>> > > So one you accept more readily because you
believe it to likely be
>> > > allegorical, the other you reject because
you believe it claims to be a
>> > > factual historical account? Surely you can
see the irony in this.
>> > >
>> > > Every consider both/neither? That it
doesn't mater whether EITHER of
>> > > these are stories of actual/factual others
or not - as they only point
>> > > to selfless realization, and
reintegration/embodiment? That they're
>> > only
>> > > expressions of the way, and are not
offering anyone else's
>> > > stories/practices/promises as things to
cling to or reject? People take
>> > > that upon themselves.
>> > >
>> > > KG
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
