Mike,

I like your explanation of Buddha's teachings in your second paragraph below 
very much.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], "mike" <uerusuboyo@...> wrote:
>
> Bill!, 
> 
> I kind of hear what you're saying, but you're argument about people being so 
> literal is like saying people will exploit unemployment benefit, so it' must 
> be a bad thing. I don't think the 5 precepts, for example, are so arbitrary 
> either. Remember, they were first mentioned 2,500 years ago and none have 
> been taken away and none added (for lay people). Surely you have to give 
> respect, no matter how grudgingly, to such longevity and efficacy. Same with 
> the 5 Hindrances. You might not like that 'hindrances' gets a capital 'H', 
> but if you take a look at them - and not just automatically dismiss them - 
> you'll see they make a lot of practical sense (in relation to meditation). 
> 
> The original teaching of Buddha is as far from religion as you can get. 
> Basically he's saying that reality can be found in our body/mind. It's always 
> there - our very own laboratory. He discourages the metaphysical; mantras; 
> creeds; beliefs; other people's insights etc. His Dharma is rational (it's 
> not always a dirty word) and can easily be experienced if we practice 
> sincerely and diligently. Yes, a Buddha doesn't need a list to follow like 
> Chairman Mao's little red book, but not many of us our born as realised 
> Buddhas. 
> 
> Mike
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote:
> >
> > Mike,
> > 
> > Okay, maybe 'mumbo-jumbo' is not the right word.  Both of these concepts to 
> > mean something.
> > 
> > What bothers me about things like this is the enumeration.  I think a lot 
> > of people take them too literally.  Like believe there are really 5 
> > specific precepts, no more no less.  The same with the Eightfold Path.  Or 
> > the 10 Commandments.  These types of things are for people who can't or 
> > don't want to take responsibility for their own lives.  They feel safer 
> > depending on someone else's list of Do's and Don't.
> > 
> > Whenever I think of these I always imagine someone carrying around a little 
> > plastic card in their shirt pocket with the 5 Precepts, and every time they 
> > need to make a decision about something they have to pull the card out and 
> > check themselves against The List.
> > 
> > This is the stuff of religion.  Religions create dogma and tell people they 
> > have to memorize and follow it so they can...whatever - go to heaven, 
> > become enlightened, be re-born into a better life, etc...  It's all crap to 
> > me.
> > 
> > Zen doesn't just give people lists of things they should or should not do, 
> > or should or should not think about.  Zen leads you to experience Buddha 
> > Nature and then you don't have to worry about any lists like these anymore. 
> >  They're all somebody else's lists anyway.  Maybe after realizing Buddha 
> > Nature you'll make your own list, but probably you won't need a list at all.
> > 
> > It's like Jesus said when asked about all the traditional Jewish laws.  He 
> > basically just said 'you don't need to know all those laws, you just need 
> > to love one another'.
> > 
> > You don't need any lists, just compassion.  And in fact if you don't have 
> > compassion even following the lists aren't going to help you anyway.
> > 
> > That's my take on it anyway...
> > 
> > ...Bill! 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "mike" <uerusuboyo@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill!,
> > > 
> > > I'm still confused as to why you would consider these terms mumbo jumbo. 
> > > For example, 'The 5 Precepts' pin-point the problems we face when we sit 
> > > own to meditate. Take any one of the precepts (not to harm any living 
> > > thing; steal; sexual misconduct; lie; intoxication). They're not commands 
> > > like in Christianity, but they help facilitate meditation because a vow 
> > > keeps us mindful of not breaking them. It's not the obviousness of 
> > > breaking them that helps meditation, but the vow not to that helps.
> > > 
> > > The Noble Eightfold Path is another useful tool for those of us on the 
> > > path. They can be seen as an explanation of the path towards cessation of 
> > > suffering, as a guideline, and as a description of the behaviour of a 
> > > Buddha. It's broken down to morality, meditation and wisdom and how to 
> > > 'achieve' them. It can be seen that morality leads to successful 
> > > meditation and meditation leads to wisdom (insight into impermanence, 
> > > no-self and the unsatisfactoriness of believing in both). Criticising 
> > > them as mumbo jumbo to me seems no different than to criciicise any 
> > > classification as the same. They might not be ultimate truth, but they're 
> > > invaluable as a guide and explanation of the Dharma. 
> > > 
> > > Mike
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > You're right; or at least what I meant by "mumbo-jumbo" is indeed 
> > > > Buddhist dogma.  Things like 'The Five Precepts' and 'The Noble 
> > > > Eightfold Path'.
> > > > 
> > > > ...Bill! 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], uerusuboyo@ wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Bill!,<br/><br/>I'm not sure why you always flog this horse about 
> > > > > Buddhism being "Mumbo jumbo". The way of Vipassana is as clear and 
> > > > > concise as any manual on making a pizza. Take a look at the 
> > > > > Dhammapada - where's the mumbo jumbo in that? It's instructions and 
> > > > > teachings are perfectly clear (putting them into practice is another 
> > > > > thing). I think you confuse the rituals and prayers to Buddha by 
> > > > > later followers with the actual teachings of Buddha. I will say, I 
> > > > > don't like the word 'Buddhism' as it implies a series of beliefs. I 
> > > > > practice Buddha Dharma, or simply the Dharma, is much more accurate 
> > > > > to my mind and is all that Vipassana 
> > > > > is.<br/><br/>Mike<br/><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to