bill...yes edgar..what is your interpretation of an open mind? can you 
clarify?..merle
  
Merle,

Edgar and I cannot agree because we have a completely different idea of what 
Buddha Nature is, and therefore what zen is.  Just why Edgar holds the opinions 
he does I don't know.  I hold mine because first and foremost they are formed 
from my experience.  Secondly they conform with what I've been taught - not 
everything I've been taught, but most of it.  Lastly they correspond with what 
I've read - not everything I've read, but most of it.

Edgar's suggestion of 'opening the mind' is fine.  I don't think anyone would 
argue that having a closed mind is better.

You'll have to ask Edgar to explain his idea of 'opening the mind' a little 
more.  I don't want to speak for him, but I SUSPECT his idea of opening the 
mind is so you can start filling it up with knowledge, but that IMO is not the 
way to experience Buddha Nature.

I could also use that phrase but if I did my idea of 'opening the mind' would 
be to start emptying it of illusions and prejudices so you can experience 
Buddha Nature.

These are two diametrically opposed approaches.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
>  
>  bill!..maybe emptying the cup and opening the mind are both the same 
> thing..check with edgar...you 2 seem to be at loggerheads over this..why?
>  can you not agree to disagree?..merle
> 
> No, I can't say I do.  At least not entirely.
> 
> Edgar's teacup is about 3/4 full.  He wants to keep filling it up.  I'm 
> advising him to empty it out.
> 
> I'm not sure what he means by 'opening the mind'.  That sounds nice an 
> new-agey, but what does it mean?  Does it mean emptying his cup?  Or does it 
> mean breaking his cup?
> 
> I think he should just empty his cup and go from there.
> 
> ...Bill!
> 
> --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> >  
> >  bill!..you agree with this surely?...opening the mind?..merle
> >   
> > Bill,
> > 
> > Zen neither empties or fills your mind. The very concept of this dualism is 
> > incorrect.
> > 
> > Zen is simply opening mind to what is. It is pure consciousness of either 
> > the forms or the formless..
> > 
> > And btw it is NOT "your mind". It is simply consciousness antecedent to any 
> > distinction of self and not-self...
> > 
> > Edgar
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Apr 27, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Bill! wrote:
> > 
> >   
> > >Edgar,
> > >
> > >Yes.  I'm afraid we have a fundamental disagreement here.
> > >
> > >I think zen practice empties out your mind, and you think it fills it up.
> > >
> > >Do you want to Rock/Paper/Scissors for it?
> > >
> > >..Bill!
> > >
> > >--- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Bill,
> > >> 
> > >> As usual you contradict the Zen teachings which I support....
> > >> 
> > >> Edgar
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> On Apr 26, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Bill! wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> > Edgar,
> > >> > 
> > >> > I see your problem now.
> > >> > 
> > >> > You think progress in zen is measured in ADDING ON things - like 
> > >> > knowledge. It's not. You progress in zen by TAKING AWAY things until 
> > >> > you get down to Just THIS!
> > >> > 
> > >> > You don't progress from Level 2 to Level 3. You progress from Level 2 
> > >> > to Level 1 and then to Level 0 which is actually no-level - Buddha 
> > >> > Nature.
> > >> > 
> > >> > You're trying to fill you cup up instead of emptying it...Bill! 
> > >> > 
> > >> > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Bill,
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > That's Niels, not Neal.
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > Go back to stage one and get it right. Do NOT pass go!
> > >> > > :-)
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > Edgar
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > On Apr 26, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Bill! wrote:
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > > Edgar,
> > >> > > > 
> > >> > > > *** Sorry, I misread your post below and Replied incorrectly. I 
> > >> > > > erased that but if you get the posts by email you might have 
> > >> > > > received it. If you did please disregard. My corrected post is ***
> > >> > > > 
> > >> > > > What do you mean Stage Three? Neal and I are done with Stage Two 
> > >> > > > and and now ready for Stage One!
> > >> > > > 
> > >> > > > ...Bill!
> > >> > > > 
> > >> > > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Bill,
> > >> > > > > 
> > >> > > > > Thanks for the quote in which Bohr correctly expresses stage two 
> > >> > > > > "mountains are no longer mountains".
> > >> > > > > 
> > >> > > > > Stage three is when those unreal illusory things are realized to 
> > >> > > > > be the true reality. Then mountains become mountains again..
> > >> > > > > 
> > >> > > > > Both Bill and Bohr haven't reached that stage yet...
> > >> > > > > 
> > >> > > > > Edgar
> > >> > > > > 
> > >> > > > > 
> > >> > > > > 
> > >> > > > > On Apr 26, 2013, at 5:38 AM, Bill! wrote:
> > >> > > > > 
> > >> > > > > > 
> > >> > > > > > Maybe Edgar will listen to him...
> > >> > > > > > 
> > >> > > > > > 
> > >> > > > > > 
> > >> > > > > > 
> > >> > > > > > ...Bill!
> > >> > > > > > 
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > 
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > 
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>


 

Reply via email to