I interpret it as the world of forms which btw is the correct translation.

Edgar



On May 16, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Bill! wrote:

> Edgar,
> 
> I agree with that statement but probably don't interpret it the same way you 
> do. I think we'd both agree with the first part of the statement. Our 
> difference would be in the second part of the statement and the use of the 
> term 'phenomena'. 
> 
> I read that as 'experience of phenomena' or more accurately just 'experience' 
> - or as I usually call it 'Buddha Nature'. This is as opposed to 
> thought/illusion which I believe is the subject of the first part of the 
> statement.
> 
> How do you interpret the term 'phenomena' as used in Dogen's statement?
> 
> ...Bill!
> 
> --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
> >
> > Bill,
> > 
> > You should really read and understand Dogen for a change.
> > 
> > He's saying what I say that you condemn, e.g. "It is an illusion to try to 
> > carry out our practice and enlightenment through ourselves, but to have 
> > practice and enlightenment through phenomena, that is enlightenment."
> > 
> > Edgar
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On May 15, 2013, at 10:55 PM, Bill! wrote:
> > 
> > > Well, here's an attempt at an explanation of that dreaded term 
> > > "Enlightenment" by Dogen. It's of course a translation but probably 
> > > pretty close since the original was written in a modern language 
> > > (Japanese) in the 1200's and translated into English by a team consisting 
> > > of a native Japanese-speaker and a native English-speaker.
> > > 
> > > It's a little long but well worth a read.
> > > 
> > > The Actualization of Enlightenment by Eihei Dogen
> > > 
> > > Translated by Kosen Nishiyama and John Stevens, 1975
> > > 
> > > "When all things are the Buddha-dharma, there is enlightenment, illusion, 
> > > practice, life, death, Buddhas, and sentient beings. When all things are 
> > > seen not to have any substance, there is no illusion or enlightenment, no 
> > > Buddhas or sentient beings, no birth, or destruction. Originally the 
> > > Buddhist Way transcends itself and any idea of abundance or lack--still 
> > > there is birth and destruction, illusion and enlightenment, sentient 
> > > beings and Buddhas. Yet people hate to see flowers fall and do not like 
> > > weeds to grow.
> > > 
> > > It is an illusion to try to carry out our practice and enlightenment 
> > > through ourselves, but to have practice and enlightenment through 
> > > phenomena, that is enlightenment. To have great enlightenment about 
> > > illusion is to be a Buddha. To have great illusion about enlightenment is 
> > > to be a sentient being. Further, some are continually enlightened beyond 
> > > enlightenment but some add more and more illusion.
> > > 
> > > When Buddhas become Buddhas, it is not necessary for them to be aware 
> > > they are Buddhas. However, they are still enlightened Buddhas and 
> > > continually realize Buddha. Through body and mind we can comprehend the 
> > > form and sound of things. They work together as one. However, if it not 
> > > like the reflection of shadow in a mirror, or the moon reflected in the 
> > > water. If you look at only one side, the other is dark.
> > > 
> > > To learn the Buddhist way is to learn about oneself. To learn about 
> > > oneself is to forget oneself. To forget oneself is to perceive oneself as 
> > > all things. To realize this is to cast off the body and mind of self and 
> > > others. When you have reached this stage you will be detached even from 
> > > enlightenment but will practice it continually without thinking about it.
> > > 
> > > When people seek the Dharma [outside themselves] they are immediately far 
> > > removed from its true location. When the Dharma has been received through 
> > > the right transmission, one's real self immediately appears.
> > > If you are in a boat, and you only look at the riverbank, you will think 
> > > that the riverbank is moving; but if you look at the boat, you will 
> > > discover that the boat itself is actually moving. Similarly, if you try 
> > > to understand the nature of phenomena only through your own confused 
> > > perception you will mistakenly think that your nature is eternal. 
> > > Furthermore, if you have the right practice and return to your origin 
> > > then you will see that all things have no permanent self.
> > > 
> > > Once firewood is reduced to ashes, it cannot return to firewood; but we 
> > > should not think of ashes as the potential stare of firewood or 
> > > vice-versa. Ash is completely ash and firewood is firewood. They have 
> > > their own past, future, and independent existence.
> > > 
> > > Similarly, when human beings die, they cannot return to life; but in 
> > > Buddhist teaching we never say that life changes into death. This is an 
> > > established teaching of the Buddhist Dharma. We call it "non-becoming." 
> > > Likewise, death cannot change into life. This is another principle of 
> > > Buddha's Law. This is called "non-destruction". Life and death have 
> > > absolute existence, like the relationship of winter and spring. But do 
> > > not think of winter changing into spring or spring to summer.
> > > 
> > > When human beings attain enlightenment, it is like the moon reflected in 
> > > the water. The moon appears in the water but does not get wet nor is the 
> > > water disturbed by the moon. Furthermore the light of the moon covers the 
> > > earth and yet it can be contained in small pool of water, a tiny dewdrop, 
> > > or even one minuscule drop of water.
> > > Just as the moon does not trouble the water in any way, do not think 
> > > enlightenment causes people difficulty. Do not consider enlightenment an 
> > > obstacle in your life. The depths of the dewdrop cannot contain the 
> > > heights of the moon and the sky.
> > > 
> > > When the True Law is not totally attained, both physically and mentally, 
> > > there is a tendency to think that we posses the complete Law and our work 
> > > is finished. If the Dharma is completely present, there is a realization 
> > > of ones insufficiencies.
> > > 
> > > For example, if you take a boat to the middle of the ocean, beyond the 
> > > sight of any mountains, and look in all four directions, the ocean appear 
> > > round. However, the ocean is not round, and its virtue is limitless. It 
> > > is like a palace and an adornment of precious jewels. But to us, the 
> > > ocean seems to be one large circle of water. So we see this can be said 
> > > of all things. Depending on the viewpoint we see things in different 
> > > ways. Correct perception depends upon the amount of ones study and 
> > > practice. In order to understand various types of viewpoints we must 
> > > study the numerous aspects and virtues of mountains and oceans, rather 
> > > than just circles. We should know that it is not only so all around us 
> > > but also within us--even in a single drop of water.
> > > 
> > > Fish in the ocean find the water endless and birds think the sky is 
> > > without limits. However, neither fish nor birds have been separated from 
> > > their element. When their need is great, their utilization is great, when 
> > > their need is small, the utilization is small. They fully utilize every 
> > > aspect to its utmost--freely, limitlessly. However, we should know that 
> > > if birds are separated from their own element they will die. We should 
> > > know hat water is life for fish and the sky is life for birds. In the 
> > > sky, birds are life; and in the water, fish are life. Many more 
> > > conclusions can be drawn like this. There is practice and enlightenment 
> > > [like the above relationships of sky and birds, fish and water]. However, 
> > > after the clarification of water and sky, we can see that if there are 
> > > birds or fish, that try to enter the sky or water, they cannot find 
> > > either a way or a place. If we understand this point, there is 
> > > actualization of enlightenment in our daily life. If we attain this this 
> > > Way, all our actions are the actualization of enlightenment. This Way, 
> > > this place, is not great or small, self or others, neither past or 
> > > present--it exists just as it is.
> > > 
> > > Like this, if we practice and realize the Buddhist way we can master and 
> > > penetrate each dharma;and we can confront and master any one practice. 
> > > There is a place where we can penetrate the Way and find the extent of 
> > > knowable perceptions. This happens because our knowledge co-exists 
> > > simultaneously with the ultimate fulfillment of the Buddhist Dharma.
> > > 
> > > After this fulfillment becomes the basis of our perception, do not think 
> > > that our perception is necessarily understood by the intellect. Although 
> > > enlightenment is actualized quickly, it is not always totally manifested 
> > > [it is too profound an inexhaustible for our limited intellect].
> > > 
> > > One day, when Zen Master Hotestsu of Mt. Mayoku was fanning himself, a 
> > > monk approached and asked, "The nature of wind never changes and blows 
> > > everywhere so why are you using a fan."
> > > 
> > > The master replied, "Although you know the nature of wind never changes 
> > > you do not know the meaning of blowing everywhere". The monk then said, 
> > > "Well, what does it mean?" Hotetsu did not speak but only continue to fan 
> > > himself. Finally the monk understood and bowed deeply before him.
> > > 
> > > The experience, the realization, and the living, right transmission of 
> > > the Buddhist Dharma is like this. To say it is not necessary to use a fan 
> > > because the ntarue of the wind never changes and there will be wind even 
> > > without one means that he does not know the real meaning of "never 
> > > changes" or the wind's nature. Just as the wind's nature never changes, 
> > > the wind of Buddhism makes the earth golden and cause the rivers to flow 
> > > with sweet, fermented milk."
> > > 
> > > This was written in mid-autumn, 1233, and given to the lay disciple 
> > > Yo-ko-shu of Kyushu.
> > > 
> > >
> >
> 
> 

Reply via email to