Edgar,

There is no external world.  That perception (illusion) is created by our 
intellect.

I agree that humans create a mental model.  That is called perception and I 
include that as an illusion.

Any structure perceived is indeed the mental model.

I disagree with you about what the ancient zen master, or anyone who has 
experienced Buddha Nature for that matter, would disagree.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>
> Bill,
> 
> No, the world of forms is the real actual information structure of the 
> external world.
> 
> Humans, and other organismic observers, all create an internal mental model 
> of that external structure. That internal model in your mind is your 
> definition..
> 
> You claim that your mental model is the only structure in reality which is 
> about as ridiculous an idea as anyone could have. Dogen and all the Zen 
> masters knew better....
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> On May 16, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Bill! wrote:
> 
> > Edgar,
> > 
> > It's late here and I'm going to bed soon. Before I do I'll leave you with 
> > my defintion of 'the world of forms'. You can comment on it and I'll pick 
> > it up when I sign back in tomorrow afternoon.
> > 
> > The 'world of forms' are all the illusions our intellect creates. They are 
> > dualistic in nature. The prime example is the illusion of the self as 
> > separate and distinct from everything else. I guess you could say 
> > 'everything else' is the 'world of forms'. This includes the perception of 
> > desks, chairs, other people, trees, buses, dogs, sunsets, spider webs, 
> > etc... as things separate and apart from 'you'. It also includes logic, 
> > reason and all rules we perceive apply to the 'world of forms'.
> > 
> > It is also what often obscures Buddha Nature which is (sensual) experience.
> > 
> > So...what is your definition of 'the world of forms'?
> > 
> > ...Bill!
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Edgar,
> > > 
> > > And how did you determine that btw?
> > > 
> > > ...Bill!
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I interpret it as the world of forms which btw is the correct 
> > > > translation.
> > > > 
> > > > Edgar
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On May 16, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Bill! wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Edgar,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I agree with that statement but probably don't interpret it the same 
> > > > > way you do. I think we'd both agree with the first part of the 
> > > > > statement. Our difference would be in the second part of the 
> > > > > statement and the use of the term 'phenomena'. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I read that as 'experience of phenomena' or more accurately just 
> > > > > 'experience' - or as I usually call it 'Buddha Nature'. This is as 
> > > > > opposed to thought/illusion which I believe is the subject of the 
> > > > > first part of the statement.
> > > > > 
> > > > > How do you interpret the term 'phenomena' as used in Dogen's 
> > > > > statement?
> > > > > 
> > > > > ...Bill!
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bill,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > You should really read and understand Dogen for a change.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > He's saying what I say that you condemn, e.g. "It is an illusion to 
> > > > > > try to carry out our practice and enlightenment through ourselves, 
> > > > > > but to have practice and enlightenment through phenomena, that is 
> > > > > > enlightenment."
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Edgar
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On May 15, 2013, at 10:55 PM, Bill! wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Well, here's an attempt at an explanation of that dreaded term 
> > > > > > > "Enlightenment" by Dogen. It's of course a translation but 
> > > > > > > probably pretty close since the original was written in a modern 
> > > > > > > language (Japanese) in the 1200's and translated into English by 
> > > > > > > a team consisting of a native Japanese-speaker and a native 
> > > > > > > English-speaker.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It's a little long but well worth a read.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The Actualization of Enlightenment by Eihei Dogen
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Translated by Kosen Nishiyama and John Stevens, 1975
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > "When all things are the Buddha-dharma, there is enlightenment, 
> > > > > > > illusion, practice, life, death, Buddhas, and sentient beings. 
> > > > > > > When all things are seen not to have any substance, there is no 
> > > > > > > illusion or enlightenment, no Buddhas or sentient beings, no 
> > > > > > > birth, or destruction. Originally the Buddhist Way transcends 
> > > > > > > itself and any idea of abundance or lack--still there is birth 
> > > > > > > and destruction, illusion and enlightenment, sentient beings and 
> > > > > > > Buddhas. Yet people hate to see flowers fall and do not like 
> > > > > > > weeds to grow.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It is an illusion to try to carry out our practice and 
> > > > > > > enlightenment through ourselves, but to have practice and 
> > > > > > > enlightenment through phenomena, that is enlightenment. To have 
> > > > > > > great enlightenment about illusion is to be a Buddha. To have 
> > > > > > > great illusion about enlightenment is to be a sentient being. 
> > > > > > > Further, some are continually enlightened beyond enlightenment 
> > > > > > > but some add more and more illusion.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > When Buddhas become Buddhas, it is not necessary for them to be 
> > > > > > > aware they are Buddhas. However, they are still enlightened 
> > > > > > > Buddhas and continually realize Buddha. Through body and mind we 
> > > > > > > can comprehend the form and sound of things. They work together 
> > > > > > > as one. However, if it not like the reflection of shadow in a 
> > > > > > > mirror, or the moon reflected in the water. If you look at only 
> > > > > > > one side, the other is dark.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > To learn the Buddhist way is to learn about oneself. To learn 
> > > > > > > about oneself is to forget oneself. To forget oneself is to 
> > > > > > > perceive oneself as all things. To realize this is to cast off 
> > > > > > > the body and mind of self and others. When you have reached this 
> > > > > > > stage you will be detached even from enlightenment but will 
> > > > > > > practice it continually without thinking about it.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > When people seek the Dharma [outside themselves] they are 
> > > > > > > immediately far removed from its true location. When the Dharma 
> > > > > > > has been received through the right transmission, one's real self 
> > > > > > > immediately appears.
> > > > > > > If you are in a boat, and you only look at the riverbank, you 
> > > > > > > will think that the riverbank is moving; but if you look at the 
> > > > > > > boat, you will discover that the boat itself is actually moving. 
> > > > > > > Similarly, if you try to understand the nature of phenomena only 
> > > > > > > through your own confused perception you will mistakenly think 
> > > > > > > that your nature is eternal. Furthermore, if you have the right 
> > > > > > > practice and return to your origin then you will see that all 
> > > > > > > things have no permanent self.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Once firewood is reduced to ashes, it cannot return to firewood; 
> > > > > > > but we should not think of ashes as the potential stare of 
> > > > > > > firewood or vice-versa. Ash is completely ash and firewood is 
> > > > > > > firewood. They have their own past, future, and independent 
> > > > > > > existence.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Similarly, when human beings die, they cannot return to life; but 
> > > > > > > in Buddhist teaching we never say that life changes into death. 
> > > > > > > This is an established teaching of the Buddhist Dharma. We call 
> > > > > > > it "non-becoming." Likewise, death cannot change into life. This 
> > > > > > > is another principle of Buddha's Law. This is called 
> > > > > > > "non-destruction". Life and death have absolute existence, like 
> > > > > > > the relationship of winter and spring. But do not think of winter 
> > > > > > > changing into spring or spring to summer.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > When human beings attain enlightenment, it is like the moon 
> > > > > > > reflected in the water. The moon appears in the water but does 
> > > > > > > not get wet nor is the water disturbed by the moon. Furthermore 
> > > > > > > the light of the moon covers the earth and yet it can be 
> > > > > > > contained in small pool of water, a tiny dewdrop, or even one 
> > > > > > > minuscule drop of water.
> > > > > > > Just as the moon does not trouble the water in any way, do not 
> > > > > > > think enlightenment causes people difficulty. Do not consider 
> > > > > > > enlightenment an obstacle in your life. The depths of the dewdrop 
> > > > > > > cannot contain the heights of the moon and the sky.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > When the True Law is not totally attained, both physically and 
> > > > > > > mentally, there is a tendency to think that we posses the 
> > > > > > > complete Law and our work is finished. If the Dharma is 
> > > > > > > completely present, there is a realization of ones 
> > > > > > > insufficiencies.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > For example, if you take a boat to the middle of the ocean, 
> > > > > > > beyond the sight of any mountains, and look in all four 
> > > > > > > directions, the ocean appear round. However, the ocean is not 
> > > > > > > round, and its virtue is limitless. It is like a palace and an 
> > > > > > > adornment of precious jewels. But to us, the ocean seems to be 
> > > > > > > one large circle of water. So we see this can be said of all 
> > > > > > > things. Depending on the viewpoint we see things in different 
> > > > > > > ways. Correct perception depends upon the amount of ones study 
> > > > > > > and practice. In order to understand various types of viewpoints 
> > > > > > > we must study the numerous aspects and virtues of mountains and 
> > > > > > > oceans, rather than just circles. We should know that it is not 
> > > > > > > only so all around us but also within us--even in a single drop 
> > > > > > > of water.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Fish in the ocean find the water endless and birds think the sky 
> > > > > > > is without limits. However, neither fish nor birds have been 
> > > > > > > separated from their element. When their need is great, their 
> > > > > > > utilization is great, when their need is small, the utilization 
> > > > > > > is small. They fully utilize every aspect to its utmost--freely, 
> > > > > > > limitlessly. However, we should know that if birds are separated 
> > > > > > > from their own element they will die. We should know hat water is 
> > > > > > > life for fish and the sky is life for birds. In the sky, birds 
> > > > > > > are life; and in the water, fish are life. Many more conclusions 
> > > > > > > can be drawn like this. There is practice and enlightenment [like 
> > > > > > > the above relationships of sky and birds, fish and water]. 
> > > > > > > However, after the clarification of water and sky, we can see 
> > > > > > > that if there are birds or fish, that try to enter the sky or 
> > > > > > > water, they cannot find either a way or a place. If we understand 
> > > > > > > this point, there is actualization of enlightenment in our daily 
> > > > > > > life. If we attain this this Way, all our actions are the 
> > > > > > > actualization of enlightenment. This Way, this place, is not 
> > > > > > > great or small, self or others, neither past or present--it 
> > > > > > > exists just as it is.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Like this, if we practice and realize the Buddhist way we can 
> > > > > > > master and penetrate each dharma;and we can confront and master 
> > > > > > > any one practice. There is a place where we can penetrate the Way 
> > > > > > > and find the extent of knowable perceptions. This happens because 
> > > > > > > our knowledge co-exists simultaneously with the ultimate 
> > > > > > > fulfillment of the Buddhist Dharma.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > After this fulfillment becomes the basis of our perception, do 
> > > > > > > not think that our perception is necessarily understood by the 
> > > > > > > intellect. Although enlightenment is actualized quickly, it is 
> > > > > > > not always totally manifested [it is too profound an 
> > > > > > > inexhaustible for our limited intellect].
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > One day, when Zen Master Hotestsu of Mt. Mayoku was fanning 
> > > > > > > himself, a monk approached and asked, "The nature of wind never 
> > > > > > > changes and blows everywhere so why are you using a fan."
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The master replied, "Although you know the nature of wind never 
> > > > > > > changes you do not know the meaning of blowing everywhere". The 
> > > > > > > monk then said, "Well, what does it mean?" Hotetsu did not speak 
> > > > > > > but only continue to fan himself. Finally the monk understood and 
> > > > > > > bowed deeply before him.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The experience, the realization, and the living, right 
> > > > > > > transmission of the Buddhist Dharma is like this. To say it is 
> > > > > > > not necessary to use a fan because the ntarue of the wind never 
> > > > > > > changes and there will be wind even without one means that he 
> > > > > > > does not know the real meaning of "never changes" or the wind's 
> > > > > > > nature. Just as the wind's nature never changes, the wind of 
> > > > > > > Buddhism makes the earth golden and cause the rivers to flow with 
> > > > > > > sweet, fermented milk."
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This was written in mid-autumn, 1233, and given to the lay 
> > > > > > > disciple Yo-ko-shu of Kyushu.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to