Bill,

Zen IS about understanding. Zen requires right understanding. Again I represent 
the core of the teaching.

"Right thought" is a core precept of the Buddha...

Right thought is correct understanding.....

Edgar



On May 19, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Bill! wrote:

> Edgar,
> 
> This kind of sophistry might work with your usual crowd but I can guarantee 
> you it won't slip by me.
> 
> The thread was about the role of teachers and students, not about messages. 
> You are the one who claims to have changed the focus to messages, but I 
> suspect that was only after I pointed out that what you wrote about the 
> relationship between authority, arrogance and truth.
> 
> Zen is NOT as personality contest...AND zen is not an UNDERSTANDING contest 
> either.
> 
> ...Bill!
> 
> --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
> >
> > Bill,
> > 
> > Why do you concentrate on personalities and thereby miss the meaning?
> > 
> > Zen is NOT a personality contest....
> > 
> > Edgar
> > 
> > 
> > On May 19, 2013, at 8:11 AM, Bill! wrote:
> > 
> > > Edgar,
> > > 
> > > The subject of this thread is the speaker (teacher) not the message as 
> > > you suggest below, but I don't have any problem with what you say below.
> > > 
> > > ...Bill!
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Bill,
> > > > 
> > > > We are talking about the message, not the speaker. The authority of the 
> > > > message is its truth. It's truth is its authority.
> > > > 
> > > > A true message is only considered arrogant by a closed, defensive and 
> > > > unawakened mind....
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Edgar
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On May 19, 2013, at 4:08 AM, Bill! wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Edgar,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I disagree with your definitions.
> > > > > 
> > > > > You can be arrogant and still speak the truth; and you can be an 
> > > > > authority and still speak falsely.
> > > > > 
> > > > > ...Bill!
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Siska,
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> The difference between arrogance and authority is whether the 
> > > > >> message is true...
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Anyway I wasn't referring to you but to those who speak here as if 
> > > > >> they speak FOR Zen without knowing what they speak is false... I'm 
> > > > >> surprised you'd consider yourself in that group.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Edgar
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> On May 18, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Merle Lester wrote:
> > > > >> 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> such arrogance edgar!..the makings of a "superman"...merle 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> Siska,
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> Yes. I continually learn from the 'teachers' on this group what NOT 
> > > > >>> to believe and what NOT to do!
> > > > >>> :-)
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> Edgar
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> On May 18, 2013, at 5:15 AM, siska wrote:
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> Hi Bill,
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> I'd say we all are teachers when others learn from us, and we are 
> > > > >>>> students whenever we are open to learn from others.
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> So, like it or not, I think you're always a teacher ;-)
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> Siska
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> Sent from Samsung tablet
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> Bill! <BillSmart@> wrote:
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> Merle,
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> We are teachers if we have a student. We are students if we have a 
> > > > >>>> teacher.
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> I was a student for many years and even was a teacher for a short 
> > > > >>>> time. At this point in my life I am neither a teacher or a student.
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> ...Bill!
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> 
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>> 
> > > > >>>>> 
> > > > >>>>> 
> > > > >>>>> Â 
> > > > >>>>> Â bill...are we not all teachers?,,,and all students?..who are we 
> > > > >>>>> if not teacher and student rolled into one..?..merle
> > > > >>>>> Â 
> > > > >>>>> Merle,
> > > > >>>>> 
> > > > >>>>> I'm not a zen teacher, certainly don't feel qualified to make up 
> > > > >>>>> a koan nor to work with anyone on an existing koan. I'll have to 
> > > > >>>>> pass on this one.
> > > > >>>>> 
> > > > >>>>> ...Bill!
> > > > >>>>> 
> > > > >>>>> --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> 
> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>>> yes so get cracking ...let's have the koan!!!!!!!!!! merle
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>>> ÃÂ 
> > > > >>>>>> Merle and Mike,
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>>> Okay, this story is labeled a 'parable' which as I said is not a 
> > > > >>>>>> koan - although could serve as the basis for a koan.
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>>> ...Bill!
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>>> --- In [email protected], uerusuboyo@ wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>>>> Merle,<br/><br/>With pleasure!<br/><br/>18. A 
> > > > >>>>>>> Parable<br/><br/>Buddha told a parable in sutra:<br/><br/>A man 
> > > > >>>>>>> traveling across a field encountered a tiger. He fled, the 
> > > > >>>>>>> tiger after him. Coming to a precipice, he caught hold of the 
> > > > >>>>>>> root of a wild vine and swung himself down over the edge. The 
> > > > >>>>>>> tiger sniffed at him from above. Trembling, the man looked down 
> > > > >>>>>>> to where, far below, another tiger was waiting to eat him. Only 
> > > > >>>>>>> the vine sustained him.<br/><br/>Two mice, one white and one 
> > > > >>>>>>> black, little by little started to gnaw away the vine. The man 
> > > > >>>>>>> saw a luscious strawberry near him. Grasping the vine with one 
> > > > >>>>>>> hand, he plucked the strawberry with the other. How sweet it 
> > > > >>>>>>> tasted!<br/><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> > > > >>>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > >>>>> 
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >> 
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > >
> >
> 
> 

Reply via email to