Joe, Apparently you're ignorant of the story of the Buddhist monk who gave his body to the hungry mother tiger to feed her starving cubs?
Edgar On Jun 24, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Joe wrote: > Merle, > > Once you're dead, it's only the aftermath of the death that could possibly > matter. > > If a Tiger eats you, no one gets to use your organs. Your organs could save > and improve the lives of 5 or 6 people. Tiger only gets one meal out of you. > Two days later, she'll need another meal. That's not great use of Human > tissue. But organ donation has that beat by miles. > > See you're just now speaking about "the fact", the fact in your present case. > But that's too miniscule a conversation, and should not concern us here. > Speaking in general, it's better to be shot dead than to be eaten by a Tiger. > > I know you agree, now that you've refreshed your view of what we're actually > talking about. > > No one wants the cataract-y corneas of most of us "Seniors". Except Tigers. > > Stay clear of Tigers, and gun-totin' killers, just the same. Long life! > > --Joe > > > Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote: > > > > that's not the point joe... > > a tiger is doing what a tiger does..having lunch.. > > a murderer is going against the grain of.."thou shalt not kill"...what's > > organ donation got to do with this?... > > if your over 70 no one wants your worn out organs here in australia.. only > > the corneas... > >
