beautiful edgar.... beautiful...!!!!!!!!... the point that joe cannot get his head around is...tiger eat lunch...murderers kill for killing's sake..though some have known to make it their lunch as well... being a burger for a tiger is a good plan...merle Joe,
Apparently you're ignorant of the story of the Buddhist monk who gave his body to the hungry mother tiger to feed her starving cubs? Edgar On Jun 24, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Joe wrote: >Merle, > >Once you're dead, it's only the aftermath of the death that could possibly >matter. > >If a Tiger eats you, no one gets to use your organs. Your organs could save >and improve the lives of 5 or 6 people. Tiger only gets one meal out of you. >Two days later, she'll need another meal. That's not great use of Human >tissue. But organ donation has that beat by miles. > >See you're just now speaking about "the fact", the fact in your present case. >But that's too miniscule a conversation, and should not concern us here. >Speaking in general, it's better to be shot dead than to be eaten by a Tiger. > >I know you agree, now that you've refreshed your view of what we're actually >talking about. > >No one wants the cataract-y corneas of most of us "Seniors". Except Tigers. > >Stay clear of Tigers, and gun-totin' killers, just the same. Long life! > >--Joe > >> Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote: >> >> that's not the point joe... >> a tiger is doing what a tiger does..having lunch.. >> a murderer is going against the grain of.."thou shalt not kill"...what's >> organ donation got to do with this?... >> if your over 70 no one wants your worn out organs here in australia.. only >> the corneas... > >
