Mike, I use a Power Mac, so I must be on the right Path! :-)
Edgar On Jun 29, 2013, at 11:49 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Edgar, > > No worries. Btw, Buddha would've been an Apple user. > > Mike > > > Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad > > From: Edgar Owen <[email protected]>; > To: <[email protected]>; > Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Fw: It was like Shiva dancing in rage > Sent: Sun, Jun 30, 2013 12:40:13 AM > > > Mike, > > > Yes, you are right. I mistook Buddha Dharma for Buddha Nature which is > another name for my ontological energy. > > As to the volume of work produced my book currently being finished up is over > 300 pages which is a lot more than Buddha ever wrote though he might have > written more if he had Microsoft Word! > :-) > > Edgar > > > > On Jun 29, 2013, at 8:19 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> >> Edgar, >> >> They're not the same thing with a different name. 'Buddha Dharma' refers to >> the whole body of work developed and taught by the Buddha including the >> sutras and methods of meditation etc. I've yet to see anything resembling >> this from you ("seeing illusion as reality" doesn't really comprise a whole >> body of work). >> >> Mike >> >> >> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad >> >> From: Edgar Owen <[email protected]>; >> To: <[email protected]>; >> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Fw: It was like Shiva dancing in rage >> Sent: Sat, Jun 29, 2013 4:45:01 PM >> >> >> Mike, >> >> It's two names for the same thing, though understood differently by many of >> course... >> >> It's not the names that matter since the thing itself is nameless. It's the >> thing itself that matters... >> >> I wouldn't get hung up in the names for it.... >> >> Edgar >> >> On Jun 29, 2013, at 10:57 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> > Edgar,<br/><br/>The Buddhadharma in its present form has been around for >> > 2,500 years and still applicable today. I wonder how long your >> > "ontological energy" theory (or whatever it is) will be >> > around?...<br/><br/>Mike<br/><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad >> >> > > >
