Mike, Yes, you are right. I mistook Buddha Dharma for Buddha Nature which is another name for my ontological energy.
As to the volume of work produced my book currently being finished up is over 300 pages which is a lot more than Buddha ever wrote though he might have written more if he had Microsoft Word! :-) Edgar On Jun 29, 2013, at 8:19 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Edgar, > > They're not the same thing with a different name. 'Buddha Dharma' refers to > the whole body of work developed and taught by the Buddha including the > sutras and methods of meditation etc. I've yet to see anything resembling > this from you ("seeing illusion as reality" doesn't really comprise a whole > body of work). > > Mike > > > Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad > > From: Edgar Owen <[email protected]>; > To: <[email protected]>; > Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Fw: It was like Shiva dancing in rage > Sent: Sat, Jun 29, 2013 4:45:01 PM > > > Mike, > > It's two names for the same thing, though understood differently by many of > course... > > It's not the names that matter since the thing itself is nameless. It's the > thing itself that matters... > > I wouldn't get hung up in the names for it.... > > Edgar > > On Jun 29, 2013, at 10:57 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > Edgar,<br/><br/>The Buddhadharma in its present form has been around for > > 2,500 years and still applicable today. I wonder how long your "ontological > > energy" theory (or whatever it is) will be > > around?...<br/><br/>Mike<br/><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad > > >
