Chris,

Mind moves mind.

Yours truely,
Peebles

You: "Over and over, I have
heard some music without really paying attention, and tuen one time have
really listened to it, and been deeply moved."
------------------------------
 On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 12:31 PM EDT Chris Austin-Lane wrote:
 
 >Are you kidding? Your intellect is where your sense of beauty come from?
 >That could not be further away from my experience. Over and over, I have
 >heard some music without really paying attention, and tuen one time have
 >really listened to it, and been deeply moved. Really also I find
 >listening/seeing/tasting/touching/smelling/introspecting in general rewards
 >attentive attending ;) with a suuden pleasurable deepening appreciation for
 >how things are, for the specific thing at hand a routine occurance.
 >
 >For beauty, there is a saying, when nothing is special, then everything
 >can be special. But our brain will be responding to beauty in any case.
 >Spontaneously. Not because of intellectual something, but our full
 >response to life clearly seen.
 >
 >Thanks,
 >--Chris
 >301-270-6524
 > On Jul 5, 2013 2:35 AM, "Bill!" <[email protected]> wrote:
 >
 >> Merle,
 >>
 >> My intellect judged them to be beautiful. That judgement was probably
 >> something I learned to mimic from hearing other people describe things as
 >> beautiful.
 >>
 >> ...Bill!
 >>
 >> --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote:
 >> >
 >> >
 >> >
 >> > Â
 >> > Â bill..how do you know they were beautiful? clarification please..merle
 >> >
 >> > I have indeed perceived many beautiful sunsets.
 >> >
 >> > But have also experienced Just THIS!
 >> >
 >> > ...Bill!
 >> >
 >> > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
 >> > >
 >> > >
 >> > >
 >> > > ÂÂ
 >> > >  bill..is that so?...is that what you have realised or have been
 >> told to believe think and feel?.. have you never seen a beautiful sunset
 >> ?...merle
 >> > >
 >> > >
 >> > > ÂÂ
 >> > > Merle,
 >> > >
 >> > > Math is judged to be beautiful because it is logical. Yes.
 >> > >
 >> > > Logic is judged to be beautiful because it deceives us into thinking
 >> we understand the truth.
 >> > >
 >> > > Truth is not beautiful or not-beautiful. Truth just is.
 >> > >
 >> > > All judgments come from your delusive intellect and self. If you are
 >> looking for 'realization' [Buddha Nature?] then you'll have to let go your
 >> attachments to such things as self, intellect, truth and beauty.
 >> > >
 >> > > ...Bill!
 >> > >
 >> > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
 >> > > >
 >> > > >
 >> > > >
 >> > > > mathematics is beautiful because it is logical
 >> > > >
 >> > > >  logic is beautiful because it is so pointing to the truth
 >> > > >
 >> > > > truth is so beautiful because it points and parts the way for
 >> realisation to take place ..
 >> > > >
 >> > > > merle
 >> > > >
 >> > > > ÂÂÂ
 >> > > > Edgar,
 >> > > >
 >> > > > Reality is not bound by logic. I'd buy your statement if you said
 >> 'math words because it accurately models our logically-based perception of
 >> reality', but I suppose that wouldn't work for you.
 >> > > >
 >> > > > ...Bill!
 >> > > >
 >> > > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
 >> > > > >
 >> > > > > Bill,
 >> > > > >
 >> > > > > No, no, no. Human math works because it DOES accurately model the
 >> actual logic of reality.
 >> > > > >
 >> > > > > Edgar
 >> > > > >
 >> > > > >
 >> > > > >
 >> > > > > On Jul 3, 2013, at 8:55 PM, Bill! wrote:
 >> > > > >
 >> > > > > > Chris,
 >> > > > > >
 >> > > > > > Mathematics doesn't reveal reality. Mathematics only mirrors the
 >> human intellect.
 >> > > > > >
 >> > > > > > ...Bill!
 >> > > > > >
 >> > > > > > --- In [email protected], Chris Austin-Lane <chris@>
 >> wrote:
 >> > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > The thing I like about math as a source of analogies for zen
 >> is that it
 >> > > > > > > shows how two different things csn br exactly the same.
 >> > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > Linear equations over reals are lines. Lines are linear
 >> equations.
 >> > > > > > > Numbers, points, the constituents drop away as the eternal
 >> unity is seen.
 >> > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > Thanks,
 >> > > > > > > --Chris
 >> > > > > > > 301-270-6524
 >> > > > > > > On Jul 3, 2013 8:12 AM, <pandabananasock@> wrote:
 >> > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > Bill!:
 >> > > > > > > > You're gonna ignore the math? I thought you said you were
 >> looking for an
 >> > > > > > > > impersonal language a couple posts ago... :D
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > The thing about using math that way is that eventually it
 >> leads you back
 >> > > > > > > > to the beginning. We use mathematics as an expression of the
 >> model, then
 >> > > > > > > > we use the model as an expression of the math. Then we
 >> realize that both
 >> > > > > > > > are models of each other and the same, and experience
 >> encompasses all -- no
 >> > > > > > > > need for anything else. Rivers and mountains become rivers
 >> and mountains
 >> > > > > > > > again!
 >> > > > > > > > ~PeeBeeEss
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------
 >> > > > > > > > On Wed, 7/3/13, Bill! <BillSmart@> wrote:
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Zen] Say Bye-Bye to the Delusion of
 >> Cause-and-Effect and
 >> > > > > > > > Karma
 >> > > > > > > > To: [email protected]
 >> > > > > > > > Date: Wednesday, July 3, 2013, 8:56 AM
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > PBS (That's going to be my TLA (Three
 >> > > > > > > > Letter Acronym) for Pandabananasock from now on)...
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > I'll ignore all the math but do agree that JUST IF there is
 >> > > > > > > > such a think that could be called 'karma' it's not so much a
 >> > > > > > > > moralistic cause-and-effect as it is an intrinsic quality of
 >> > > > > > > > the act itself.
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > But, I'll continue to poo-poo all claims of karma.
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > ...Bill!
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > --- In [email protected],
 >> > > > > > > > pandabananasock@ wrote:
 >> > > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > > Most people think of "1+1=2" as procedural, that is,
 >> > > > > > > > that there is 1, THEN we add 1 to it, THEN it becomes
 >> > > > > > > > 2. They would regard "2=1+1" and "2=2" to be different
 >> > > > > > > > equations, but they are not in the least bit
 >> > > > > > > > different. The equal-sign is the present.
 >> > > > > > > > > "1+1" is already 2! And the effect IS the
 >> > > > > > > > cause. Your karmic punishment for doing something
 >> > > > > > > > "bad" is you doing that "bad" thing. Your karmic
 >> > > > > > > > reward for doing something "good" is you doing that "good"
 >> > > > > > > > thing. Forget the come-back-to-bite-you BS!
 >> > > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------
 >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 4:58 AM EDT Bill! wrote:
 >> > > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > > >...Bill!
 >> > > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have
 >> > > > > > > > read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups
 >> > > > > > > > Links
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > [email protected]
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > > Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have
 >> read or are
 >> > > > > > > > reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > > >
 >> > > > > > >
 >> > > > > >
 >> > > > > >
 >> > > > >
 >> > > >
 >> > >
 >> >
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> ------------------------------------
 >>
 >> Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
 >> reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>


------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to