> Hindsight being what it is; if the circumstances of September 11th were known on 
>September 9th and actions were taken against Afganistan and the terrorists on 
>September 10th; I suspect alot of you would be yelling that this was a war of 
>aggression and not self-defense.

That doesn't make much sense, given that the offenders were *U.S.* residents of 
*Saudi* background. What good would attacking Afghanistan have done at the time?

> Further, I suspect as President Bush said a few days ago, it will take a mushroom 
>cloud over some U.S. city to take action against Sadam.
> I guess an actual attack on the U.S. changes doves into hawks; or does it. Once a 
>dove always a dove.

Is that a question or a statement?

Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling 
short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author solely; 
its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer, nor those of 
any organization with which the author may be associated.

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html      ///

This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!

Reply via email to