Marc A. Schindler wrote: > Perhaps we need two different definitions: Christ-like, and Christian?
Either you're being ironic (in which case, congratulations for such a clever pun!) or you're feeling just as frustrated as I. We should avoid labels, it is true, but we do need terms and definitions so we know what we're talking about. Over on Scott Adams' site and in his Dilbert Newsletter, he refers to dull-witted people as "inDUHviduals." We obviously need some similar term for those who stubbornly refuse the fullness, preferring to pick and choose from the Gospel and commandments, but who are still good and fine people. "Terrestial" may be the best term we have (the Lord certainly doesn't seem shy about using the term) but it sure sounds condescending. (The Lord is permitted to sound condescending because, let's face it, he's pretty darned superior to us.) *jeep! --Chet "Start by doing what's necessary, then what's possible, and suddenly you are doing the impossible." ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html /// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
