Marc A. Schindler wrote:
> Perhaps we need two different definitions: Christ-like, and Christian?
Either you're being ironic (in which case, congratulations for such a
clever pun!) or you're feeling just as frustrated as I. We should avoid
labels, it is true, but we do need terms and definitions so we know what
we're talking about.
Over on Scott Adams' site and in his Dilbert Newsletter, he refers to
dull-witted people as "inDUHviduals." We obviously need some similar
term for those who stubbornly refuse the fullness, preferring to pick
and choose from the Gospel and commandments, but who are still good and
fine people. "Terrestial" may be the best term we have (the Lord
certainly doesn't seem shy about using the term) but it sure sounds
condescending. (The Lord is permitted to sound condescending because,
let's face it, he's pretty darned superior to us.)
"Start by doing what's necessary, then what's possible, and suddenly you
are doing the impossible."
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
This email was sent to: email@example.com
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!