At 05:24 PM 3/22/2004, Ron Scott wrote in response to Jim Cobabe:

>Equal protection is already afforded in our laws, for
>legitimate and
>traditional marriage.  Nothing in the constitution
>envisions the
>degraded definition of "marriage" that encompasses any
>particular union
>of convenience, affection, devotion, or animal
>attraction. <

It seems that some equally thoughtful judges in Massachusetts and
elsewhere disagree with you.  By proposing the constitutional
amendment, the proposers themselves and supporters indicate that
they too don't agree with you.

Obviously these "thoughtful judges" are simply wrong--in light of the Church's teachings on this subject, as well documented by Jim.

-- Steven Montgomery [EMAIL PROTECTED]

". . . it is as much their [The Elders of Israel] duty to study correct political principles as well as religion, and to seek and know and comprehend the social and political interests of man, and to learn and be able to teach that which would be best calculated to promote the interests of the world."--John Taylor

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///      ///
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:

Reply via email to