I think we should go for both of them. If one fails, we have an 
alternative method. As it is, there probably will not be a perfect 
solution, but in this case some solution may be better than allowing SSM 
from proliferating.

Gary Smith

Steven Montgomery wrote:
> At 02:05 PM 3/23/2004, you wrote:
> >Tell us how you feel about the amendment now that we know there's
> >a move afoot to change the language? <grin> What's Wilkins
> >reaction to same? This thing is beginning to feel like an
> >election year stunt gone haywire.
> >
> >RBS
> The marriage amendment is doomed to failure. That's my opinion and how I 
> feel. That's exactly why I support the never mentioned 
> alternative--urging 
> Congress to use their powers under article III, section 2 to limit the 
> jurisdiction of federal courts.
> --
> Steven Montgomery
> Far on the right, her dogs foul Scylla hides:Charybdis roaring on the
> left presides,And in her greedy whirlpool sucks the tides;Then spouts
> them from below: with fury driv'n,The waves mount up and wash the face
> of heav'n.But Scylla from her den, with open jaws,The sinking vessel in
> her eddy draws,Then dashes on the rocks--Virgil

Gerald (Gary) Smith
geraldsmith@ juno.com

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html      ///
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:

Reply via email to