Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 07:02:32AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote: >>> - why is there no locking around the pre-detach hook? >> That hasn't changed with this code but if I recall correctly, the idea >> was that predetach is not making any changes to the zone so we don't >> lock until actual changes to the state are being made. >> > > hm. that differs from the description in the dtd. the dtd says the > callback should be carefull making changes since it could be invoked > multiple times. it doesn't say anything about being read-only or > concurrent invocations. i'd probably just be best to include locking > around the pre-detach call.
Ed, OK, I'll move the locking up. Thanks, Jerry _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list email@example.com