Michael Bernstein wrote:
>
> In fact, if
> catalog_object and uncatalog_object are interchangeable with
> index_object and unindex_object, then I'm sure I don't
> understand the point of inheriting from CatalogAware at all.
Hehe... many would agree with that sentiment.
The point behind CatalogAware was, as I understand it, that the object
inheriting from CatalogAware wouldn't have to worry about managing its
own indexing. Sadly, that didn't work out...
cheers,
Chris
> Is it reindex_object, which doesn't seem to have an
> equivalent?
yup...
> Scratching-my-head-over-this-whole-CatalogAware-thing-ly
Hehe... it's probably not worth worrying about ;-)
cheers,
Chris
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
