On Tuesday 13 April 2004 22:17, Tres Seaver wrote:
> >>Of course, having two packages with names differing only in case is a
> >>bit ugly.
> >>Do we want to consider renaming one or both of these packages
> >>to avoid the conflict?
> -1 to renaming 'Zope'; the amount of third-party code which we would
> break is incalculable. -0 to renaming 'zope' to 'z3', or something; at
> least third party code for Zope3 was built in the test-driven culture,
> and has at least some chance of migrating cleanly with confidence.
You wanna rename 'zope' to 'z3' for the purpose of merging the two? I really
hope that will not be the case. Or is this for Zope 2 only?
I would hate to have imports like "z3.app.foo" or even "z3.i18n". I am
definitely -1 on this option, if it also applies to standalone Zope 3.
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -