Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 13 April 2004 22:17, Tres Seaver wrote:


Of course, having two packages with names differing only in case is a
bit ugly.

Do we want to consider renaming one or both of these packages
to avoid the conflict?

-1 to renaming 'Zope'; the amount of third-party code which we would break is incalculable. -0 to renaming 'zope' to 'z3', or something; at least third party code for Zope3 was built in the test-driven culture, and has at least some chance of migrating cleanly with confidence.

You wanna rename 'zope' to 'z3' for the purpose of merging the two? I really hope that will not be the case. Or is this for Zope 2 only?

Note that I am -0 to the idea.

I would hate to have imports like "" or even "z3.i18n". I am definitely -1 on this option, if it also applies to standalone Zope 3.

I am just arguing that it would be saner to rename 'zope' to 'z3' (or 'zope3', or whatever) than to rename 'Zope' to 'zope2' (or whatever).

Tres Seaver                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zope Corporation      "Zope Dealers"

Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to