On Wednesday 14 April 2004 11:08, Jim Fulton wrote: > I want to solve the problem of having both "zope" and "Zope".
Great! I would very much prefer a solution like that. > > I really > > hope that will not be the case. > > Why? I was referring to renaming "zope" to "zope3" or similar. > > I would hate to have imports like "z3.app.foo" or even "z3.i18n". > > Why? Because in general I don't like version numbers in the path. I also think that "zope" is the only name that is 100% right on. Everything else is a compromise I would try to avoid. We will be sorry about it later, when many more people run Zope 3 only applications. > What about "z.app.foo" or "z.i18n"? The shortness of this example is very attractive, but it is still a compromise in my opinion. Again, I think educating is easier than anything else. People understand that this is due to a merge of codebases and is for a transition period only. And, the TTW scripter will not care. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )