On Wednesday 14 April 2004 01:49 am, Andreas Jung wrote:
> What is the recommend way to migrate existing code?
> I assume using:
> import logging
> logger = logging.getLogger(loggername).
That works, and certainly matches what I've been doing, and what we see in the
Zope 3 codebase as well.
> When I look through the Zope HEAD code then you are using e.g.
> 'zodb.conn' or 'zodb.storage' but also 'Zope' as loggername. Do we
> have to agree on some common usage of the logger names?
> E.g. for logging calls in the reST package....better using 'Zope' or
I don't think there is a general convention at this time; where I've switched
things over (only a few places), I've used what was being passed to zLOG.LOG
as the subsystem parameter. Where there's no precedent... I don't know. A
guiding convention would be nice; I could see using the package name if
there's nothing else that sticks out as obvious. That doesn't match a lot of
the existing usage, though.
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fred at zope.com>
PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -