Max M wrote:
Martin Kretschmar wrote:

Shortly said, the whole set of stupidities in
connection with Zope3. It is a pretty bad state
for a project, if it looms for years as the
followup project on the horizon but in reality
isn't one!


It looks like the classical strategic mistake:

http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html

Well, I don't agree with this assessment for Zope 3. We needed the freedom to work oput new ideas and patterns. Trying to use existing code would have been a huge distraction. I think that the result proves that we were right. The beauty of our approach is that, having built what we've built, we'll be able to take advantage of that code in the current platform.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]       Python Powered!
CTO                  (540) 361-1714            http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation     http://www.zope.com       http://www.zope.org


_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to