Chris McDonough wrote:

On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 23:11, Steve Jibson wrote:

Chris,

Okay, correct me if I'm wrong. This means the big ugly SESSION problem his completely fixed. If so, you are my new best friend! (whether you like it or not).


Well, I'm afraid I will need to correct you. ;-)  There is one more
corner case that hasn't been covered that exhibits itself when a session
is accessed from within the standard_error_message.  It requires a
change in the main publishing code, for which exists a patch that hasn't
quite yet been vetted (see earlier posts in this thread regarding
Publish.py).  This should work itself out over the next week or so I
suspect.

Relatively speaking, this is only a minor concern. It just means I shouldn't try to access session in the standard_error_message until a solution is found. We were doing that in our product and I've already pulled that out. After all, there are NEVER any errors, so why should we need to monkey with standard_error_message ;-)
It would be nice, for completeness, if this were resolved for 2.7.1.



Anyway, I'll put your updates (TemporaryStorage.py and Transience.py) on a couple of my customer's systems (that have been experiencing regular KeyErrors in SESSION) on Monday and I'll let you know if I see any problems.


Thanks... make sure you use the latest code from the Zope-2_7-branch in
CVS.


Am I safe just dropping those two files from CVS into an existing 2.7 site or do I need to grab everything else from the Zope-2_7-branch?






_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to