Hi Chris!

Chris McDonough wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 15:42 +0200, yuppie wrote:
Reading the sources I had the impression that the fact there was no warning for the deprecated feature was a bug and I did consider my change a bugfix. Without warning it was already deprecated for many years.

That is the case for meta_types and __ac_permissions__ but I think you
mistook the fact that "methods" followed a comment that said "handle
old-style product data" for the fact that it was deprecated.  But it
never was officially deprecated, nor did it ever need to be.  It just
*happened* to follow that comment, lumped in with meta_types and
__ac_permissions__.  The deprecation warning is nonsensical there.
"please use registerClass instead" is a non-sequitur as a deprecation
warning, because registerClass will not help you do what "methods" does.

It's not that simple. registerClass has an optional 'legacy' argument that does something quite similar. It just monkey patches ObjectManager instead of Folder. So at least for some use cases registerClass *will* help you.

I might be wrong, but it looks like the 'legacy' argument was added exactly for that one purpose: Providing a migration path for 'methods'. I doubt it was ever good practice to use 'methods' for something else than factory methods. Don't know how many products out there use 'methods' for something else. But so far the only product mentioned is ExternalEditor.

BTW: The name and comments in the code of the 'legacy' argument make clear that using these legacy methods is deprecated as well.

I'm fine with extending the deprecation period by one more release cycle.

That's fine for __ac_permissions__ and meta_types, but can't we just
leave 'methods' in?  IMO, deprecating it was a simple mistake, and
that's OK.  We don't need to make another mistake by actually removing
it for the sake of being consistent with the earlier mistake.

If adding deprecation warnings for 'methods' was a mistake it was not a simple mistake. I still believe it should be removed.

You ignored my argument regarding the shorter deprecation period. But if there is a consensus that old deprecations without explicit deprecation message don't count I'm fine with extending the period for __ac_permissions__ and meta_types as well.



Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to