Martijn Faassen wrote at 2007-10-24 18:38 +0200: > ... >I >disagree with the position that should not ever treat an adapter >registration as an implementation detail to provide some default >behavior. Sometimes the behavior of a library *relies* on certain >adapters being registered. An example is an adapter registration to >generate an appropriate error message (if no more specific adapters >are registered by the user of the library).
But requiring that a more specific adapter must be registered can be a bit tedious -- as it may require to define an additional (and unnatural) interface that derives from the original one -- just to be able to register a more specific adapter... -- Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
