On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 13:04, Roger Ineichen <d...@projekt01.ch> wrote: > You can also call this anticipation the oposit of participation
:) > The big questions now is, do we like to merge this good things > back to the zope core or do we like to stay with different > packages because we can't find an agreement what we like > to do. Just to be completely clear: I do absolutely think we should merge as much goodness back as possible. I also agree with everything Martijn Faassen said. Except, I do not think a steering group is necessary to achieve these goals, and that in fact there is a significant risk that is ends up hindering them. "I thought I could organize freedom. How Scandinavian of me" --Björk: Hunter. -- Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista. http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
