Chris McDonough wrote:
> I believe to get success here (measured as gaining new Python developer
> users),
> our path forward needs to be way, way, way more radical and needs to involve
> making hard choices that treat individual packages on their own merit rather
> than even considering their role as part of a larger collection. That's the
> bottom line and I believe it's our fundamental point of disagreement. IMO,
> the
> part a package plays as part of the larger collection should be utterly and
> brutally subservient to its merit as a standalone package. Also IMO, if there
> were absolutely no list of versions known to work together, but each piece
> worked on its own and had merit on its own, we'd be in a far better place as
> far
> as attracting new users. Any list of packages-known-to-work-together should
> be
> a "oh, by the way, this might be handy", not the raison d'etre of the group
> and
> this discussion.
+ lots
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
