Martijn Faassen wrote: > Jim Fulton wrote: > [snip] >> I'd rather leave zope.publsiher more or less alone, but develop a new >> thing that has the basic/core functionality we need and refactor >> zope.publisher to use that. > > I had the impression Shane was doing that; i.e. building zope.pipeline > factoring bits out of the publisher but not really changing the > publisher very much itself, creating a new structure instead. Shane, is > that correct?
Yes. I think Jim and I are saying the same thing there. The current code in zope.pipeline doesn't reflect that thinking, though, because we really need to divide zope.publisher somehow before a project like this makes sense. > +1 on the WebOb compatibility. I imagine it should be possible to > reconstruct our request and response interfaces on top of WebOb's. We > should also think of ways so that code can get the WebOb request > directly instead of having to go through these adapters. I'd also be > much in favor of reusing WebOb's implementation, not just the APIs. I > think it could help us replace part of the publisher. That should be a great thing to work on in a sprint. > Thanks. I'm very much in favor of you guys talking at PyCon if that's > the best way to make progress. I'm also looking forward to seeing Shane > again at PyCon after meeting him so briefly all these years ago when I > was still young and nimble. So I'm glad to hear he's going to make it! > I'm also happy I'll get to see you again as well! I'll be the one who arrives Monday afternoon without much hair on top. :-) Shane _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
