On Wednesday 11 March 2009, Martijn Faassen wrote: > I think the latter is the least important right now, especially since > zope.component and zope.schema are already very foundational libraries. > So just add the vocabulary to zope.password if that is the only new > dependencies it will pull in as a result. > > In my opinion going for an extra here just to avoid this is speculating > a bit too much right now. Do we really have users that want to use > zope.password and really don't want zope.component and zope.schema? If > so, we'll hear from them when they speak up and *then* declare an extra > or take some other action.
+1. I want more of our decisions to go into this direction. It is a sign that we turn the # of packages knob as well. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter Web Software Design, Development and Training Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter" _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
