Jim Fulton wrote:
> We and canonical use the Zope Framework. We don't use an
> application. Zope (aka Zope 2) is an extensible application. We (ZC
> and Canonical and others) assemble components from the Zope Framework
> to build our own applications.
Hmm, maybe I got this wrong, but Gary Poster expressed a strong concern
that "zope 3 the app server" needed to keep living.
I do think the name "Zope" should never be used on its own again.
I think "Zope Classic" would certainly work for "Zope 2 the app server",
it conveys the right things:
- mature
- stable
- maybe not the best choice for new development.
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
