Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> Gary Poster wrote:
>>> Within the constraints above, then, in line with your original proposal, 
>>> I think we'd be fine with "Zope Framework," and "Zope 2."  We certainly 
>>> don't need Zope-3-the-tarball, if that's what you meant.
>> Zope Framework (and maybe even ZF4) seems to have general agreement.
>> "Zope 2" can't stay as is, because people stick in in the chain of:
>> Zope 1, Zope 2, Zope 3, Zope Framework 4
>> there will be confusion.
> This isn't a chain. 

*we* know that, but any sane human being wondering past won't.

> Zope Framework is not Zope the app server. It's a 
> collection of libraries used by Zope 2 and Zope 3.

See comment above ;-)

Everyone seems in agreement that "Zope Framework" is fine, and 4.0 would 
be a good idea as a version number to make that official and clear.

I'd like to see a list of possible names for "Zope 2" and "Zope 3" 
collected (I'm happy to do this) and put to a vote of the foundation 
membership *soon* and then we can get on with actually using the new 
names once you (as currently leader of the Zope world ;-) ) have made an 



Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to