Martijn Faassen wrote: > Chris Withers wrote: >> Gary Poster wrote: >>> Within the constraints above, then, in line with your original proposal, >>> I think we'd be fine with "Zope Framework," and "Zope 2." We certainly >>> don't need Zope-3-the-tarball, if that's what you meant. >> Zope Framework (and maybe even ZF4) seems to have general agreement. >> >> "Zope 2" can't stay as is, because people stick in in the chain of: >> Zope 1, Zope 2, Zope 3, Zope Framework 4 >> ...so there will be confusion. > > This isn't a chain.
*we* know that, but any sane human being wondering past won't. > Zope Framework is not Zope the app server. It's a > collection of libraries used by Zope 2 and Zope 3. See comment above ;-) Everyone seems in agreement that "Zope Framework" is fine, and 4.0 would be a good idea as a version number to make that official and clear. I'd like to see a list of possible names for "Zope 2" and "Zope 3" collected (I'm happy to do this) and put to a vote of the foundation membership *soon* and then we can get on with actually using the new names once you (as currently leader of the Zope world ;-) ) have made an announcement. cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )