Gary Poster wrote:
> 
> Within the constraints above, then, in line with your original proposal, 
> I think we'd be fine with "Zope Framework," and "Zope 2."  We certainly 
> don't need Zope-3-the-tarball, if that's what you meant.

Zope Framework (and maybe even ZF4) seems to have general agreement.

"Zope 2" can't stay as is, because people stick in in the chain of:
Zope 1, Zope 2, Zope 3, Zope Framework 4
...so there will be confusion.

"Zope Standard 4.0" is my current choice, on the basis that I've not 
heard any complaints against it yet and I know Andreas hates Zope 
Classic ;-)

> As a related aside, I personally think that Plone should be featured here.

Indeed.

ZF4 as the base for ZS, Plone, Grok and Repoze works for me :-)

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to