Gary Poster wrote:
> Within the constraints above, then, in line with your original proposal,
> I think we'd be fine with "Zope Framework," and "Zope 2." We certainly
> don't need Zope-3-the-tarball, if that's what you meant.
Zope Framework (and maybe even ZF4) seems to have general agreement.
"Zope 2" can't stay as is, because people stick in in the chain of:
Zope 1, Zope 2, Zope 3, Zope Framework 4
...so there will be confusion.
"Zope Standard 4.0" is my current choice, on the basis that I've not
heard any complaints against it yet and I know Andreas hates Zope
> As a related aside, I personally think that Plone should be featured here.
ZF4 as the base for ZS, Plone, Grok and Repoze works for me :-)
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -