Gary Poster wrote: > > Within the constraints above, then, in line with your original proposal, > I think we'd be fine with "Zope Framework," and "Zope 2." We certainly > don't need Zope-3-the-tarball, if that's what you meant.
Zope Framework (and maybe even ZF4) seems to have general agreement. "Zope 2" can't stay as is, because people stick in in the chain of: Zope 1, Zope 2, Zope 3, Zope Framework 4 ...so there will be confusion. "Zope Standard 4.0" is my current choice, on the basis that I've not heard any complaints against it yet and I know Andreas hates Zope Classic ;-) > As a related aside, I personally think that Plone should be featured here. Indeed. ZF4 as the base for ZS, Plone, Grok and Repoze works for me :-) Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )