Chris Withers wrote:
> Gary Poster wrote:
>> Within the constraints above, then, in line with your original proposal, 
>> I think we'd be fine with "Zope Framework," and "Zope 2."  We certainly 
>> don't need Zope-3-the-tarball, if that's what you meant.
> Zope Framework (and maybe even ZF4) seems to have general agreement.
> "Zope 2" can't stay as is, because people stick in in the chain of:
> Zope 1, Zope 2, Zope 3, Zope Framework 4
> there will be confusion.

This isn't a chain. Zope Framework is not Zope the app server. It's a 
collection of libraries used by Zope 2 and Zope 3.



Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to