Chris Withers wrote:
> Gary Poster wrote:
>> Within the constraints above, then, in line with your original proposal,
>> I think we'd be fine with "Zope Framework," and "Zope 2." We certainly
>> don't need Zope-3-the-tarball, if that's what you meant.
> Zope Framework (and maybe even ZF4) seems to have general agreement.
> "Zope 2" can't stay as is, because people stick in in the chain of:
> Zope 1, Zope 2, Zope 3, Zope Framework 4
> ...so there will be confusion.
This isn't a chain. Zope Framework is not Zope the app server. It's a
collection of libraries used by Zope 2 and Zope 3.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -