Chris Withers wrote: > Gary Poster wrote: >> Within the constraints above, then, in line with your original proposal, >> I think we'd be fine with "Zope Framework," and "Zope 2." We certainly >> don't need Zope-3-the-tarball, if that's what you meant. > > Zope Framework (and maybe even ZF4) seems to have general agreement. > > "Zope 2" can't stay as is, because people stick in in the chain of: > Zope 1, Zope 2, Zope 3, Zope Framework 4 > ...so there will be confusion.
This isn't a chain. Zope Framework is not Zope the app server. It's a collection of libraries used by Zope 2 and Zope 3. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )