On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Shane Hathaway <sh...@hathawaymix.org> wrote: > Martijn Faassen wrote: >> If we don't call Zope Framework "4.0", we'll be fine. We should call its >> first release 1.0 and there's no implication of a progression. > > +1 on calling it Zope Framework 1.0. We need the people who have been > burned by past Zope releases to take another look, because we believe > Zope is finally getting simpler. Those people would assume > Zope-anything 4.0 is just piling on more complexity, while a version 1.0 > release would invalidate that assumption and suggest they take another look.
Maybe I'm dense, but from the description of the Zope Framework (from http://docs.zope.org/zopeframework/about/index.html) as "a collection of libraries managed by the Zope developers," I can't imagine a non-Zope person being interested at all. As far as I can tell, the Zope Framework is a project management structure, not something outsiders would be interested in. -- Benji York Senior Software Engineer Zope Corporation _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
