On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Shane Hathaway <sh...@hathawaymix.org> wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> If we don't call Zope Framework "4.0", we'll be fine. We should call its
>> first release 1.0 and there's no implication of a progression.
> +1 on calling it Zope Framework 1.0. We need the people who have been
> burned by past Zope releases to take another look, because we believe
> Zope is finally getting simpler. Those people would assume
> Zope-anything 4.0 is just piling on more complexity, while a version 1.0
> release would invalidate that assumption and suggest they take another look.
Maybe I'm dense, but from the description of the Zope Framework (from
http://docs.zope.org/zopeframework/about/index.html) as "a collection of
libraries managed by the Zope developers," I can't imagine a non-Zope
person being interested at all.
As far as I can tell, the Zope Framework is a project management
structure, not something outsiders would be interested in.
Senior Software Engineer
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -