Lennart Regebro wrote:
> A more truthful story is that Zope Toolkit is a base for writing
> frameworks, and that one of those frameworks was Zope 3, now renamed
> to <something cool>. But the support in this thread for the previous
> story makes me wonder if we shouldn't push that, slightly more
> incorrect story, anyway. People seem to understand it. It's in this
> situation possible that it's better with a false story that people
> understand than a correct story that just adds to the confusion.

Yeah, I've been thinking the same. But I think it's even unclear what 
the correct story is given the lack of interest people have in the Zope 
3 project beyond what the toolkit offers.

I think Carsten says it well though, contrasting external and internal 
communication, and not just making the term "Zope 3" disappear.

We should just retain the Zope 3 name to the outside world for the time 
being, but de-emphasize it in our communication. We push Zope Toolkit a 
lot more. If people want to get started using the toolkit, we point them 
to Grok, BFG and Plone.



Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to