Hey, Lennart Regebro wrote: > A more truthful story is that Zope Toolkit is a base for writing > frameworks, and that one of those frameworks was Zope 3, now renamed > to <something cool>. But the support in this thread for the previous > story makes me wonder if we shouldn't push that, slightly more > incorrect story, anyway. People seem to understand it. It's in this > situation possible that it's better with a false story that people > understand than a correct story that just adds to the confusion.
Yeah, I've been thinking the same. But I think it's even unclear what the correct story is given the lack of interest people have in the Zope 3 project beyond what the toolkit offers. I think Carsten says it well though, contrasting external and internal communication, and not just making the term "Zope 3" disappear. We should just retain the Zope 3 name to the outside world for the time being, but de-emphasize it in our communication. We push Zope Toolkit a lot more. If people want to get started using the toolkit, we point them to Grok, BFG and Plone. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )