On Apr 17, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 18:00, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote: >> I think it is clear that you are disregarding many people's opinions. > > What opinions have been disregarded, more exactly?
Gary's, Mine, Tres', Simon's, Benji's and others I could find if I trolled through the thread, which I won't. Continuing to talk about Zope 3 is harmful. Saying that Zope 3 is a dead end is also harmful. Saying that Zope 3 is being renamed to Zope Toolkit with some things left out and with some possible Zope 3 project that may or may not support the bits left out is at best too confusing. Simply saying that we're renaming Zope 3 to the Zope Toolkit is clean and simple. The fact that the contents of the toolkit will change over time as parts are gradually deprecated or receive less care is a detail that doesn't have to be part of the main message. At worst, the message Gary suggests is imprecise. It isn't inaccurate. Of course, Gary made these points more eloquently than I just did. Jim -- Jim Fulton Zope Corporation _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )