Gary Poster wrote:
> I think I could get fully behind the following proposal that others have made
> (Shane I think was one of several?).
Thinking about it a bit, it strikes me that IFoo.adapt(context) may not
be right. This reads "IFoo adapt context", which doesn't make sense.
What I really want to hear is "context adapted to IFoo". So maybe it's
Just thinking out loud.
Thinking out loud further, I think I may actually prefer IFoo.instance()
instead of .utility(), but maybe that debate is already passed.
.utility() is OK too.
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -