Gary Poster wrote:
> I think I could get fully behind the following proposal that others have made 
> (Shane I think was one of several?).
> 
> IFoo.adapt(...)
> 
> IFoo.utility(...)

Thinking about it a bit, it strikes me that IFoo.adapt(context) may not 
be right. This reads "IFoo adapt context", which doesn't make sense. 
What I really want to hear is "context adapted to IFoo". So maybe it's

   IFoo.adapting(context)?
   IFoo.adapterFor(context)?
   IFoo.adapter(context)?

Just thinking out loud.

Thinking out loud further, I think I may actually prefer IFoo.instance() 
instead of .utility(), but maybe that debate is already passed. 
.utility() is OK too.

Martin

-- 
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to