-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Fred Drake wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Martijn Faassen <faas...@startifact.com>
>> But right now we need to provide some guidance for how people can move
>> away from these packages in a sane manner. And we should make sure we
>> continue to test the zope.app.* packages when we make ZTK changes, for
>> the time being.
>> Let's work out a plan and a timeline.
> I think we disagree as to the scale of what's needed still.
> I'd be happy to see a copy of the ZTK tree get made to some
> recognizable name ("ZATK", for "Zope App Toolkit", would suffice), let
> Hanno commit his removal of the zope.app packages from the ZTK, and
> then make the ZATK refer to that version of the ZTK instead of
> including it directly.
> The only timeline that's needed is the order of the commits.
> If there's anyone who wants to maintain the new bastard-stepchild,
> they're free to step forward. There's no obligation on the part of
> the ZTK maintainers to do that, nor should there be.
> That's the whole point.
+1. My feelinge exactly.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -